G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $199 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 70.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 28.0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 295W, a 245W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX Vega 64 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Radeon RX Vega 64

2017

Why buy it

✅4.7% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
66.3% HIGHER MSRP
$499 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 28.0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
❌490% higher power demand at 295W vs 50W.

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

2023

Radeon RX Vega 64

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $199 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 70.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 28.0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 295W, a 245W reduction.

Why buy it

✅4.7% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX Vega 64 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
66.3% HIGHER MSRP
$499 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 28.0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
❌490% higher power demand at 295W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile better than Radeon RX Vega 64?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is clearly the better overall GPU here. Radeon RX Vega 64 averages 4.7% more FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 14,332 vs 13,949 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon RX Vega 64 is a 2017 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2017, better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling, and a 5nm process instead of 14nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $300 MSRP. GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is about $199 cheaper on MSRP at $300 MSRP versus $499 MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and 2.7% higher G3D Mark. Moving to $300 MSRP gets you newer hardware, lower power draw (50W vs 295W), and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.

Is Radeon RX Vega 64 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon RX Vega 64 is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below $499 MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with newer hardware and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile Benchmark Check

Radeon RX Vega 64 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile	Radeon RX Vega 64
1080p
low	136 FPS	141 FPS
medium	120 FPS	126 FPS
high	105 FPS	108 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	90 FPS
1440p
low	120 FPS	122 FPS
medium	99 FPS	100 FPS
high	84 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	72 FPS	71 FPS
4K
low	67 FPS	68 FPS
medium	59 FPS	57 FPS
high	42 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	37 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile Open Radeon RX Vega 64

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile	Radeon RX Vega 64
1080p
low	296 FPS	317 FPS
medium	245 FPS	279 FPS
high	188 FPS	224 FPS
ultra	145 FPS	186 FPS
1440p
low	198 FPS	215 FPS
medium	166 FPS	187 FPS
high	137 FPS	160 FPS
ultra	109 FPS	128 FPS
4K
low	105 FPS	103 FPS
medium	87 FPS	88 FPS
high	75 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	57 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile Open Radeon RX Vega 64

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile	Radeon RX Vega 64
1080p
low	645 FPS	628 FPS
medium	516 FPS	502 FPS
high	430 FPS	418 FPS
ultra	322 FPS	314 FPS
1440p
low	442 FPS	471 FPS
medium	373 FPS	377 FPS
high	316 FPS	314 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	235 FPS
4K
low	321 FPS	314 FPS
medium	258 FPS	251 FPS
high	200 FPS	209 FPS
ultra	153 FPS	157 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile Open Radeon RX Vega 64

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile	Radeon RX Vega 64
1080p
low	484 FPS	391 FPS
medium	424 FPS	347 FPS
high	360 FPS	295 FPS
ultra	322 FPS	236 FPS
1440p
low	402 FPS	314 FPS
medium	351 FPS	279 FPS
high	285 FPS	228 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	181 FPS
4K
low	240 FPS	200 FPS
medium	203 FPS	188 FPS
high	185 FPS	152 FPS
ultra	159 FPS	127 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile Open Radeon RX Vega 64

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile and Radeon RX Vega 64

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1455 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,332 points.

Radeon RX Vega 64

The Radeon RX Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1247 MHz to 1546 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,949 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile scores 14,332 and the Radeon RX Vega 64 reaches 13,949 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX Vega 64 uses GCN 5.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 4,096 (Radeon RX Vega 64). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 12.66 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 64). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1546 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile	Radeon RX Vega 64
G3D Mark Score	14,332+3%	13,949
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	GCN 5.0
Process Node	5 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	2560	4096+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.986 TFLOPS	12.66 TFLOPS+41%
Boost Clock	1755 MHz+14%	1546 MHz
ROPs	48	64+33%
TMUs	80	256+220%
L1 Cache	2.5 MB+150%	1 MB
L2 Cache	12 MB+200%	4 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon RX Vega 64 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX Vega 64 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile	Radeon RX Vega 64
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 484 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega 64) — a 152.1% advantage for the Radeon RX Vega 64. Bus width: 96-bit vs 2048-bit. L2 Cache: 12 MB (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX Vega 64) — the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile	Radeon RX Vega 64
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	HBM2
Memory Bandwidth	192 GB/s	484 GB/s+152%
Bus Width	96-bit	2048-bit+2033%
L2 Cache	12 MB+200%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX Vega 64). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile	Radeon RX Vega 64
DirectX	12.2	12.1
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon RX Vega 64). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 64).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile	Radeon RX Vega 64
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	VCE 4.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	UVD 7.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile draws 50W versus the Radeon RX Vega 64's 295W — a 142% difference. The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 750W (Radeon RX Vega 64). Power connectors: Mobile vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile	Radeon RX Vega 64
TDP	50W-83%	295W
Recommended PSU	500W-33%	750W
Power Connector	Mobile	2x 8-pin
Length	0mm	267mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C-6%	85°C
Perf/Watt	286.6+506%	47.3

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile launched at $300 MSRP, while the Radeon RX Vega 64 launched at $499. The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile costs 39.9% less ($199 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 28.0 (Radeon RX Vega 64) — the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile offers 70.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).