
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Popular choices:

Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
2013Why buy it
- β Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- β100% higher power demand at 30W vs 15W.
Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C
2020Why buy it
- β Less risky long-term buy than Iris Pro Graphics 5200: it remains the more sensible modern option while Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- β Draws 15W instead of 30W, a 15W reduction.
- β More future proof: Vega (2017β2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2020-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
2013Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C
2020Why buy it
- β Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- β Less risky long-term buy than Iris Pro Graphics 5200: it remains the more sensible modern option while Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- β Draws 15W instead of 30W, a 15W reduction.
- β More future proof: Vega (2017β2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- β100% higher power demand at 30W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2020-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is Iris Pro Graphics 5200 better than Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C make more sense than Iris Pro Graphics 5200?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 16 FPS | 52 FPS |
| medium | 11 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 20 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 52 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 40 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 20 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 15 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 13 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 52 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 40 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 20 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 13 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 52 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 8 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 20 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 7 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 5 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 13 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C

Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 27 2013. It features the Generation 7.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 22 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.


Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C
Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C
The Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2020. It features the Vega architecture. The boost clock speed is 2100 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,166 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 scores 1,172 and the Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C reaches 1,166 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is built on Generation 7.5 while the Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C uses Vega, both on 22 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 320 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 512 (Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 2100 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,172 | 1,166 |
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Vega |
| Process Node | 22 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 320 | 512+60% |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 2100 MHz+75% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 draws 30W versus the Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C's 15W β a 66.7% difference. The Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W | 15W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Perf/Watt | 39.1 | 77.7+99% |
Value Analysis
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 launched at $150 MSRP, while the Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C launched at $150. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.8 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 7.8 (Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C) β the Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C offers 0% better value. The Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.8 | 7.8 |
| Codename | Haswell GT3e | Vega |
| Release | May 27 2013 | January 7 2020 |
| Ranking | #835 | #545 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














