
Quadro RTX 8000
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 9060 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro RTX 8000
2018Why buy it
- ✅58.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 48 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌3244.1% HIGHER MSRP$9,999 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 67.1 G3D/$ ($9,999 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌73.3% higher power demand at 260W vs 150W.
Radeon RX 9060 XT
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $9,700 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 3268.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 67.1 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 260W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 8000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quadro RTX 8000
2018Radeon RX 9060 XT
2025Why buy it
- ✅58.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $9,700 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 3268.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 67.1 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 260W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 48 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌3244.1% HIGHER MSRP$9,999 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 67.1 G3D/$ ($9,999 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌73.3% higher power demand at 260W vs 150W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 8000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 9060 XT better than Quadro RTX 8000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro RTX 8000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon RX 9060 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 205 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 166 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 151 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 130 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 54 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon RX 9060 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 463 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 379 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 272 FPS |
| ultra | 289 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 325 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 127 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 65 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon RX 9060 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 897 FPS | 839 FPS |
| medium | 717 FPS | 685 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 602 FPS |
| ultra | 448 FPS | 452 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 673 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 538 FPS | 523 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 449 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 448 FPS | 448 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 357 FPS |
| high | 299 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 226 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon RX 9060 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 673 FPS | 751 FPS |
| medium | 605 FPS | 611 FPS |
| high | 515 FPS | 532 FPS |
| ultra | 448 FPS | 452 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 599 FPS |
| medium | 487 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 418 FPS | 422 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 355 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 323 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 297 FPS | 292 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 226 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 8000 and Radeon RX 9060 XT

Quadro RTX 8000
Quadro RTX 8000
The Quadro RTX 8000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,927 points. Launch price was $9,999.

Radeon RX 9060 XT
Radeon RX 9060 XT
The Radeon RX 9060 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 18 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2220 MHz to 3230 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,070 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 8000 scores 19,927 and the Radeon RX 9060 XT reaches 20,070 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 8000 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 9060 XT uses RDNA 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 9060 XT). Raw compute: 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 26.46 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 9060 XT). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 3230 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 32 (Radeon RX 9060 XT) with 576 Tensor cores.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon RX 9060 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,927 | 20,070 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 4.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608+125% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.31 TFLOPS | 26.46 TFLOPS+62% |
| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz | 3230 MHz+82% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 288+125% | 128 |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 72+125% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 9060 XT is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro RTX 8000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The Quadro RTX 8000 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 9060 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon RX 9060 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 8000 comes with 48 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 9060 XT has 8 GB. The Quadro RTX 8000 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 320 GB/s (Radeon RX 9060 XT) — a 140% advantage for the Quadro RTX 8000. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 9060 XT) — the Quadro RTX 8000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon RX 9060 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+500% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 768 GB/s+140% | 320 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 9060 XT). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon RX 9060 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs VCN 5.0 (Radeon RX 9060 XT). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP10 vs VCN 5.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 9060 XT).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon RX 9060 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7.0 | VCN 5.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP10 | VCN 5.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 8000 draws 260W versus the Radeon RX 9060 XT's 150W — a 53.7% difference. The Radeon RX 9060 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 500W (Radeon RX 9060 XT). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon RX 9060 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 260W | 150W-42% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 76.6 | 133.8+75% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro RTX 8000 launched at $9999 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 9060 XT launched at $299. The Radeon RX 9060 XT costs 97% less ($9700 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.0 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 67.1 (Radeon RX 9060 XT) — the Radeon RX 9060 XT offers 3255% better value. The Radeon RX 9060 XT is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon RX 9060 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $9999 | $299-97% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.0 | 67.1+3255% |
| Codename | TU102 | Navi 44 |
| Release | August 13 2018 | May 18 2025 |
| Ranking | #78 | #72 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












