
Radeon RX 6700 XT
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 6700 XT
2021Why buy it
- ✅94.8% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌37.2% HIGHER MSRP$479 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 41.2 vs 57.4 G3D/$ ($479 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌206.7% higher power demand at 230W vs 75W.
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 39.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 57.4 vs 41.2 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 230W, a 155W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6700 XT across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Radeon RX 6700 XT
2021Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
2025Why buy it
- ✅94.8% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 39.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 57.4 vs 41.2 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 230W, a 155W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌37.2% HIGHER MSRP$479 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 41.2 vs 57.4 G3D/$ ($479 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌206.7% higher power demand at 230W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6700 XT across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB better than Radeon RX 6700 XT?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 6700 XT still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 6700 XT | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 6700 XT | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 298 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 112 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 19 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 6700 XT | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 867 FPS | 630 FPS |
| medium | 705 FPS | 497 FPS |
| high | 593 FPS | 415 FPS |
| ultra | 444 FPS | 364 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 404 FPS |
| medium | 532 FPS | 338 FPS |
| high | 444 FPS | 282 FPS |
| ultra | 333 FPS | 229 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 444 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 117 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 6700 XT | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 703 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 197 FPS |
| high | 491 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 412 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 451 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 367 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 322 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 285 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 257 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 210 FPS | 49 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6700 XT and Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB

Radeon RX 6700 XT
Radeon RX 6700 XT
The Radeon RX 6700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2321 MHz to 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,754 points. Launch price was $479.

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 2 2025. It features the RDNA 4 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2530 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,024 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6700 XT scores 19,754 and the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB reaches 20,024 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6700 XT is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB uses RDNA 4, both on 7 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon RX 6700 XT) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB). Boost clocks: 2581 MHz vs 2530 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700 XT | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,754 | 20,024+1% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 4 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 |
| Boost Clock | 2581 MHz+2% | 2530 MHz |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 + AFMF | FSR Upscaling + Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support Frame Generation, but the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is on a newer tier with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1, while the Radeon RX 6700 XT tops out at FSR Frame Generation + AFMF.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700 XT | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 6700 XT comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB has 16 GB. The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 384 GB/s (Radeon RX 6700 XT) vs 320 GB/s (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB) — a 20% advantage for the Radeon RX 6700 XT. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700 XT | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 384 GB/s+20% | 320 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6700 XT) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700 XT | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE (Radeon RX 6700 XT) vs VCN 5.0 (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB). Decoder: UVD vs VCN 5.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (Radeon RX 6700 XT) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700 XT | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE | VCN 5.0 |
| Decoder | UVD | VCN 5.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6700 XT draws 230W versus the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB's 75W — a 101.6% difference. The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon RX 6700 XT) vs 550W (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700 XT | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 230W | 75W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 550W-15% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 240mm |
| Height | 110mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 85.9 | 267.0+211% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6700 XT launched at $479 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB launched at $349. The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB costs 27.1% less ($130 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 41.2 (Radeon RX 6700 XT) vs 57.4 (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB) — the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB offers 39.3% better value. The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700 XT | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $479 | $349-27% |
| Performance per Dollar | 41.2 | 57.4+39% |
| Codename | Navi 22 | — |
| Release | March 3 2021 | January 2 2025 |
| Ranking | #80 | #45 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












