
Radeon RX 7900M
Popular choices:

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 7900M
2023Why buy it
- ✅15.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌63.6% higher power demand at 180W vs 110W.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 180W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7900M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon RX 7900M
2023RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅15.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 180W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌63.6% higher power demand at 180W vs 110W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7900M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 7900M better than RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 7900M | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 202 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 7900M | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 576 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 480 FPS | 365 FPS |
| high | 368 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 314 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 326 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 272 FPS |
| high | 257 FPS | 222 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 194 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 108 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 7900M | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 938 FPS | 870 FPS |
| medium | 769 FPS | 712 FPS |
| high | 672 FPS | 626 FPS |
| ultra | 504 FPS | 499 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 709 FPS | 691 FPS |
| medium | 583 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 504 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 374 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 495 FPS | 470 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 383 FPS |
| high | 336 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 252 FPS | 249 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 7900M | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 765 FPS | 459 FPS |
| medium | 653 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 588 FPS | 344 FPS |
| ultra | 504 FPS | 302 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 640 FPS | 381 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 340 FPS |
| high | 480 FPS | 284 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 244 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 435 FPS | 242 FPS |
| medium | 379 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 336 FPS | 188 FPS |
| ultra | 252 FPS | 163 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7900M and RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

Radeon RX 7900M
Radeon RX 7900M
The Radeon RX 7900M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 19 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2090 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,385 points.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 7424 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 58 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,167 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 7900M scores 22,385 and the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile reaches 22,167 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 7900M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,608 (Radeon RX 7900M) vs 7,424 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 38.52 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7900M) vs 24.72 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 2090 MHz vs 1665 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (Radeon RX 7900M) vs 58 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 232.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7900M | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,385 | 22,167 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608 | 7424+61% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 38.52 TFLOPS+56% | 24.72 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2090 MHz+26% | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 192+140% | 80 |
| TMUs | 288+24% | 232 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | 7.3 MB+143% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 48 MB+700% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 72+24% | 58 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support Frame Generation, but the Radeon RX 7900M is on a newer tier with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile tops out at DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7900M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7900M | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 7900M comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile has 12 GB. The Radeon RX 7900M offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 576 GB/s (Radeon RX 7900M) vs 432 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) — a 33.3% advantage for the Radeon RX 7900M. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Radeon RX 7900M) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7900M | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+33% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 576 GB/s+33% | 432 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 48 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 7900M) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 1.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7900M | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7900M) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7900M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7900M | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7900M draws 180W versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile's 110W — a 48.3% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 330W (Radeon RX 7900M) vs 150W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: Mobile vs Mobile. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7900M | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 110W-39% |
| Recommended PSU | 330W | 150W-55% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 124.4 | 201.5+62% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












