
Radeon RX 7700
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7900M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 7700
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7900M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Radeon RX 7900M
2023Why buy it
- ✅39.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 49.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
Radeon RX 7700
2023Radeon RX 7900M
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅39.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7900M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 49.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 7900M better than Radeon RX 7700?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 7700 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 7700 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 7700 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 576 FPS |
| medium | 319 FPS | 480 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 368 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 314 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 229 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 197 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 156 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 209 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 113 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 7700 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 838 FPS | 938 FPS |
| medium | 684 FPS | 769 FPS |
| high | 600 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 498 FPS | 504 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 643 FPS | 709 FPS |
| medium | 520 FPS | 583 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 504 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 252 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 7700 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 602 FPS | 765 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 653 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 588 FPS |
| ultra | 352 FPS | 504 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 465 FPS | 640 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 549 FPS |
| high | 320 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 258 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 291 FPS | 435 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 379 FPS |
| high | 232 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 252 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7700 and Radeon RX 7900M

Radeon RX 7700
Radeon RX 7700
The Radeon RX 7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,146 points.

Radeon RX 7900M
Radeon RX 7900M
The Radeon RX 7900M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 19 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2090 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,385 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 7700 scores 22,146 and the Radeon RX 7900M reaches 22,385 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 7700 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon RX 7900M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 6 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon RX 7700) vs 4,608 (Radeon RX 7900M). Raw compute: 20.48 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7700) vs 38.52 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7900M). Boost clocks: 2600 MHz vs 2090 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (Radeon RX 7700) vs 72 (Radeon RX 7900M).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7700 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,146 | 22,385+1% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 4608+125% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.48 TFLOPS | 38.52 TFLOPS+88% |
| Boost Clock | 2600 MHz+24% | 2090 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 192+200% |
| TMUs | 128 | 288+125% |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 3 MB+500% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 + AFMF | FSR 3 + AFMF |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 32 | 72+125% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smooth motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7700 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 16 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 624 GB/s (Radeon RX 7700) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon RX 7900M) — a 8.3% advantage for the Radeon RX 7700. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 7700) vs 6 MB (Radeon RX 7900M) — the Radeon RX 7900M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7700 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 624 GB/s+8% | 576 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 7700) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7900M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7700 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7700) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7900M). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7900M).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7700 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7700 draws 190W versus the Radeon RX 7900M's 180W — a 5.4% difference. The Radeon RX 7900M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon RX 7700) vs 330W (Radeon RX 7900M). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7700 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 190W | 180W-5% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 330W-49% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 240mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 116.6 | 124.4+7% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












