
Radeon RX 7700
Popular choices:

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 7700
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌72.7% higher power demand at 190W vs 110W.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅20.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 190W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 49.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
Radeon RX 7700
2023RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅20.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 190W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌72.7% higher power demand at 190W vs 110W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 49.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile better than Radeon RX 7700?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 7700 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 7700 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 7700 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 319 FPS | 365 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 229 FPS | 326 FPS |
| medium | 197 FPS | 272 FPS |
| high | 156 FPS | 222 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 108 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 7700 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 838 FPS | 870 FPS |
| medium | 684 FPS | 712 FPS |
| high | 600 FPS | 626 FPS |
| ultra | 498 FPS | 499 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 643 FPS | 691 FPS |
| medium | 520 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 374 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 470 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 383 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 249 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 7700 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 602 FPS | 459 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 344 FPS |
| ultra | 352 FPS | 302 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 465 FPS | 381 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 340 FPS |
| high | 320 FPS | 284 FPS |
| ultra | 258 FPS | 244 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 291 FPS | 242 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 232 FPS | 188 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 163 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7700 and RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

Radeon RX 7700
Radeon RX 7700
The Radeon RX 7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,146 points.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 7424 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 58 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,167 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 7700 scores 22,146 and the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile reaches 22,167 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 7700 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on 6 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon RX 7700) vs 7,424 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 20.48 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7700) vs 24.72 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 2600 MHz vs 1665 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (Radeon RX 7700) vs 58 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 232.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7700 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,146 | 22,167 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 7424+263% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.48 TFLOPS | 24.72 TFLOPS+21% |
| Boost Clock | 2600 MHz+56% | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 80+25% |
| TMUs | 128 | 232+81% |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 7.3 MB+1360% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 32 | 58+81% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support Frame Generation, but the Radeon RX 7700 is on a newer tier with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile tops out at DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7700 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 7700 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile has 12 GB. The Radeon RX 7700 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 624 GB/s (Radeon RX 7700) vs 432 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) — a 44.4% advantage for the Radeon RX 7700. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 7700) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7700 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+33% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 624 GB/s+44% | 432 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 7700) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7700 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7700) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7700 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7700 draws 190W versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile's 110W — a 53.3% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon RX 7700) vs 150W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7700 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 190W | 110W-42% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 150W-77% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 240mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 116.6 | 201.5+73% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












