
L40
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
L40
2022Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 24 GB).
- ✅Draws 300W instead of 355W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7900 XTX is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌3003.1% HIGHER MSRP$31,000 MSRPvs$999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.1 vs 31.3 G3D/$ ($31,000 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Radeon RX 7900 XTX
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $30,001 less on MSRP ($999 MSRP vs $31,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2877.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.3 vs 1.1 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $31,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 24 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌18.3% higher power demand at 355W vs 300W.
L40
2022Radeon RX 7900 XTX
2022Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 24 GB).
- ✅Draws 300W instead of 355W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $30,001 less on MSRP ($999 MSRP vs $31,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2877.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.3 vs 1.1 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $31,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7900 XTX is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌3003.1% HIGHER MSRP$31,000 MSRPvs$999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.1 vs 31.3 G3D/$ ($31,000 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 24 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌18.3% higher power demand at 355W vs 300W.
Quick Answers
So, is L40 better than Radeon RX 7900 XTX?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 7900 XTX make more sense than L40?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | L40 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 252 FPS | 244 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 185 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 251 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 100 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | L40 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 525 FPS | 871 FPS |
| medium | 407 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 310 FPS | 524 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 459 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 440 FPS | 677 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 273 FPS | 434 FPS |
| ultra | 215 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 233 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 183 FPS | 307 FPS |
| high | 162 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 236 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | L40 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 999 FPS | 945 FPS |
| medium | 999 FPS | 775 FPS |
| high | 978 FPS | 690 FPS |
| ultra | 734 FPS | 595 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 970 FPS | 714 FPS |
| medium | 880 FPS | 587 FPS |
| high | 734 FPS | 511 FPS |
| ultra | 550 FPS | 432 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 569 FPS | 501 FPS |
| medium | 493 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 358 FPS |
| ultra | 367 FPS | 295 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | L40 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 492 FPS | 951 FPS |
| medium | 430 FPS | 805 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 718 FPS |
| ultra | 293 FPS | 626 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 346 FPS | 718 FPS |
| medium | 311 FPS | 607 FPS |
| high | 273 FPS | 527 FPS |
| ultra | 208 FPS | 459 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 229 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 197 FPS | 439 FPS |
| high | 156 FPS | 388 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 339 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of L40 and Radeon RX 7900 XTX

L40
L40
The L40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 13 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 2490 MHz. It has 18176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 142 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 32,601 points.

Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Radeon RX 7900 XTX
The Radeon RX 7900 XTX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 3 2022. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1929 MHz to 2498 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 355W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,285 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The L40 scores 32,601 and the Radeon RX 7900 XTX reaches 31,285 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The L40 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 7900 XTX uses RDNA 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 18,176 (L40) vs 6,144 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Raw compute: 90.52 TFLOPS (L40) vs 61.39 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Boost clocks: 2490 MHz vs 2498 MHz. Ray tracing: 142 RT cores (L40) vs 96 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX) with 568 Tensor cores.
| Feature | L40 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 32,601+4% | 31,285 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 18176+196% | 6144 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 90.52 TFLOPS+47% | 61.39 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2490 MHz | 2498 MHz |
| ROPs | 192 | 192 |
| TMUs | 568+48% | 384 |
| L1 Cache | 17.8 MB+493% | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+1500% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 142+48% | 96 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7900 XTX is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The L40 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | L40 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The L40 comes with 48 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7900 XTX has 24 GB. The L40 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 96 MB (L40) vs 6 MB (Radeon RX 7900 XTX) — the L40 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | L40 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+100% | 24 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 960 GB/s | 960 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 384-bit |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+1500% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (L40) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | L40 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th Gen (L40) vs AMD Dual Media Engine (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs AMD Dual Media Engine. Supported codecs: AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (L40) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX).
| Feature | L40 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th Gen | AMD Dual Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | AMD Dual Media Engine |
| Codecs | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The L40 draws 300W versus the Radeon RX 7900 XTX's 355W — a 16.8% difference. The L40 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (L40) vs 800W (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Power connectors: 16-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 287mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 68°C.
| Feature | L40 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W-15% | 355W |
| Recommended PSU | 750W-6% | 800W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 287mm |
| Height | 111mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 68°C-15% |
| Perf/Watt | 108.7+23% | 88.1 |
Value Analysis
The L40 launched at $31000 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7900 XTX launched at $999. The Radeon RX 7900 XTX costs 96.8% less ($30001 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.1 (L40) vs 31.3 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX) — the Radeon RX 7900 XTX offers 2745.5% better value.
| Feature | L40 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $31000 | $999-97% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.1 | 31.3+2745% |
| Codename | AD102 | Navi 31 |
| Release | October 13 2022 | November 3 2022 |
| Ranking | #61 | #12 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












