
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7800M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅+68.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon RX 7800M
2024Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (15,984 vs 26,919).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Radeon RX 7800M
2024Why buy it
- ✅+68.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (15,984 vs 26,919).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than Radeon RX 7800M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 7800M make more sense than GeForce RTX 4070?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 51 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 452 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 313 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 344 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 286 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 191 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 92 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 719 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 575 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 360 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 432 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 270 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 180 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 687 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 575 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 360 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 432 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 270 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 180 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Radeon RX 7800M

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon RX 7800M
Radeon RX 7800M
The Radeon RX 7800M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,984 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Radeon RX 7800M's 15,984 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 68.4%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 7800M uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 3,840 (Radeon RX 7800M). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 35.87 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7800M). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 2335 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 60 (Radeon RX 7800M) with 184 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+68% | 15,984 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+53% | 3840 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS | 35.87 TFLOPS+23% |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+6% | 2335 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 184 | 240+30% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+673% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+800% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 60+30% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4070 uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 7800M relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7800M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 12 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 432 GB/s (Radeon RX 7800M) — a 16.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 7800M) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s+17% | 432 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+800% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7800M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7800M). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7800M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Radeon RX 7800M's 180W — a 10.5% difference. The Radeon RX 7800M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 650W (Radeon RX 7800M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 304mm vs 0mm, occupying 3 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 180W-10% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 304mm | 0mm |
| Height | 137mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 3 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+52% | 88.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7800M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | — |
| Codename | AD104 | Navi 32 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | September 11 2024 |
| Ranking | #32 | #131 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












