
GeForce RTX 2070
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7800M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2070
2018Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Radeon RX 7800M
2024Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2070
2018Radeon RX 7800M
2024Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2070 better than Radeon RX 7800M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 7800M make more sense than GeForce RTX 2070?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 51 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 327 FPS | 452 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 313 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 344 FPS |
| medium | 177 FPS | 286 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 191 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 92 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 723 FPS | 719 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 575 FPS |
| high | 482 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 362 FPS | 360 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 542 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 434 FPS | 432 FPS |
| high | 362 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 271 FPS | 270 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 362 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 289 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 241 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 180 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 472 FPS | 687 FPS |
| medium | 401 FPS | 575 FPS |
| high | 320 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 360 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 385 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 432 FPS |
| high | 254 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 270 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 220 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 168 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 180 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2070 and Radeon RX 7800M

GeForce RTX 2070
GeForce RTX 2070
The GeForce RTX 2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 17 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,068 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon RX 7800M
Radeon RX 7800M
The Radeon RX 7800M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,984 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2070 scores 16,068 and the Radeon RX 7800M reaches 15,984 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2070 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 7800M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 2070) vs 3,840 (Radeon RX 7800M). Raw compute: 7.465 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2070) vs 35.87 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7800M). Boost clocks: 1620 MHz vs 2335 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2070) vs 60 (Radeon RX 7800M) with 288 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,068 | 15,984 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 3840+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.465 TFLOPS | 35.87 TFLOPS+381% |
| Boost Clock | 1620 MHz | 2335 MHz+44% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 144 | 240+67% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+207% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36 | 60+67% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7800M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 2070 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 2070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7800M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7800M has 12 GB. The Radeon RX 7800M offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2070) vs 432 GB/s (Radeon RX 7800M) — a 3.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2070. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+4% | 432 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce RTX 2070) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7800M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (GeForce RTX 2070) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7800M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP9 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce RTX 2070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7800M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP9 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2070 draws 175W versus the Radeon RX 7800M's 180W — a 2.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 2070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 2070) vs 650W (Radeon RX 7800M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 175W-3% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.8+3% | 88.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7800M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | — |
| Codename | TU106 | Navi 32 |
| Release | October 17 2018 | September 11 2024 |
| Ranking | #129 | #131 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













