
GeForce GTX 1080
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7800M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1080
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon RX 7800M
2024Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1080
2016Radeon RX 7800M
2024Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 7800M better than GeForce GTX 1080?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1080 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 51 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 289 FPS | 452 FPS |
| medium | 242 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 313 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 344 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 286 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 191 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 92 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 702 FPS | 719 FPS |
| medium | 562 FPS | 575 FPS |
| high | 468 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 360 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 527 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 432 FPS |
| high | 351 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 270 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 180 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 399 FPS | 687 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 575 FPS |
| high | 281 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 241 FPS | 360 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 332 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 432 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 270 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 180 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1080 and Radeon RX 7800M

GeForce GTX 1080
GeForce GTX 1080
The GeForce GTX 1080 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,609 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon RX 7800M
Radeon RX 7800M
The Radeon RX 7800M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,984 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1080 scores 15,609 and the Radeon RX 7800M reaches 15,984 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1080 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 7800M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 3,840 (Radeon RX 7800M). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 35.87 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7800M). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2335 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,609 | 15,984+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3840+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 35.87 TFLOPS+304% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 2335 MHz+35% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 160 | 240+50% |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+25% | 768 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7800M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1080 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 1080 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7800M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1080 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7800M has 12 GB. The Radeon RX 7800M offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 320 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 432 GB/s (Radeon RX 7800M) — a 35% advantage for the Radeon RX 7800M. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 7800M) — the Radeon RX 7800M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 432 GB/s+35% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7800M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1080) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7800M). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 1080) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7800M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1080 draws 180W versus the Radeon RX 7800M's 180W — a 0% difference. The Radeon RX 7800M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 650W (Radeon RX 7800M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 86.7 | 88.8+2% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7800M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | — |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 32 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | September 11 2024 |
| Ranking | #137 | #131 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













