
Quadro P6000
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7700S
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro P6000
2016Why buy it
- ✅193% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (23 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 23 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1236.1% HIGHER MSRP$5,999 MSRPvs$449 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 34.6 G3D/$ ($5,999 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 250W vs 100W.
Radeon RX 7700S
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,550 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1237.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 34.6 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 250W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 23 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quadro P6000
2016Radeon RX 7700S
2023Why buy it
- ✅193% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (23 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,550 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1237.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 34.6 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 250W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 23 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1236.1% HIGHER MSRP$5,999 MSRPvs$449 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 34.6 G3D/$ ($5,999 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 250W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 23 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 7700S better than Quadro P6000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P6000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro P6000 | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 233 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 48 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro P6000 | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 369 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 313 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 196 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 229 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 195 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 55 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro P6000 | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 698 FPS | 699 FPS |
| medium | 558 FPS | 559 FPS |
| high | 465 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 524 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 349 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 233 FPS | 233 FPS |
| ultra | 175 FPS | 175 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro P6000 | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 566 FPS | 600 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 512 FPS |
| high | 418 FPS | 440 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 452 FPS | 463 FPS |
| medium | 396 FPS | 392 FPS |
| high | 319 FPS | 319 FPS |
| ultra | 260 FPS | 256 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 290 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 267 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 175 FPS | 175 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P6000 and Radeon RX 7700S

Quadro P6000
Quadro P6000
The Quadro P6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,512 points. Launch price was $5,999.

Radeon RX 7700S
Radeon RX 7700S
The Radeon RX 7700S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2500 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,527 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P6000 scores 15,512 and the Radeon RX 7700S reaches 15,527 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P6000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 7700S uses RDNA 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Quadro P6000) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7700S). Raw compute: 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P6000) vs 20.48 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7700S). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 2500 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,512 | 15,527 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840+88% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.63 TFLOPS | 20.48 TFLOPS+62% |
| Boost Clock | 1645 MHz | 2500 MHz+52% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 240+88% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB+180% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7700S is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P6000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P6000 comes with 23 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7700S has 8 GB. The Quadro P6000 offers 193% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (Quadro P6000) vs 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 7700S) — a 50% advantage for the Quadro P6000. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Quadro P6000) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7700S) — the Quadro P6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 23.438 GB+193% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s+50% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P6000) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (Radeon RX 7700S). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Quadro P6000) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7700S). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P6000) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 7700S).
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5.0 (2x) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P6000 draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 7700S's 100W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon RX 7700S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro P6000) vs 650W (Radeon RX 7700S). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 100W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 62.0 | 155.3+150% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P6000 launched at $5999 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7700S launched at $449. The Radeon RX 7700S costs 92.5% less ($5550 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.6 (Quadro P6000) vs 34.6 (Radeon RX 7700S) — the Radeon RX 7700S offers 1230.8% better value. The Radeon RX 7700S is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5999 | $449-93% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.6 | 34.6+1231% |
| Codename | GP102 | Navi 33 |
| Release | October 1 2016 | January 4 2023 |
| Ranking | #141 | #140 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













