
Quadro P6000
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6800S
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro P6000
2016Why buy it
- ✅193% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (23 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 23 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌649.9% HIGHER MSRP$5,999 MSRPvs$800 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 19.8 G3D/$ ($5,999 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 250W vs 100W.
Radeon RX 6800S
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,199 less on MSRP ($800 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 665.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 19.8 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 250W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 23 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quadro P6000
2016Radeon RX 6800S
2022Why buy it
- ✅193% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (23 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,199 less on MSRP ($800 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 665.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 19.8 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 250W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 23 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌649.9% HIGHER MSRP$5,999 MSRPvs$800 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 19.8 G3D/$ ($5,999 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 250W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 23 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 6800S better than Quadro P6000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P6000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro P6000 | Radeon RX 6800S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 207 FPS |
| medium | 233 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 53 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro P6000 | Radeon RX 6800S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 229 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 195 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 51 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro P6000 | Radeon RX 6800S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 698 FPS | 713 FPS |
| medium | 558 FPS | 570 FPS |
| high | 465 FPS | 475 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 356 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 524 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 267 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 349 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 233 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 175 FPS | 178 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro P6000 | Radeon RX 6800S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 566 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 395 FPS |
| high | 418 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 275 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 452 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 396 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 319 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 260 FPS | 205 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 175 FPS | 130 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P6000 and Radeon RX 6800S

Quadro P6000
Quadro P6000
The Quadro P6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,512 points. Launch price was $5,999.

Radeon RX 6800S
Radeon RX 6800S
The Radeon RX 6800S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 2100 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,841 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P6000 scores 15,512 and the Radeon RX 6800S reaches 15,841 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P6000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 6800S uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Quadro P6000) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 6800S). Raw compute: 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P6000) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6800S). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 2100 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Radeon RX 6800S |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,512 | 15,841+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840+88% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.63 TFLOPS+47% | 8.602 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1645 MHz | 2100 MHz+28% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 240+88% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB+180% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6800S is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P6000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Radeon RX 6800S |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P6000 comes with 23 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6800S has 8 GB. The Quadro P6000 offers 193% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (Quadro P6000) vs 256 GB/s (Radeon RX 6800S) — a 68.8% advantage for the Quadro P6000. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Quadro P6000) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 6800S) — the Quadro P6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Radeon RX 6800S |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 23.438 GB+193% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s+69% | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P6000) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 6800S). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Radeon RX 6800S |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Quadro P6000) vs RDNA 2 Media Engine (Radeon RX 6800S). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs RDNA 2 Media Engine. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P6000) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6800S).
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Radeon RX 6800S |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5.0 (2x) | RDNA 2 Media Engine |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | RDNA 2 Media Engine |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P6000 draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 6800S's 100W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon RX 6800S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro P6000) vs 650W (Radeon RX 6800S). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Radeon RX 6800S |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 100W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 62.0 | 158.4+155% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P6000 launched at $5999 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6800S launched at $800. The Radeon RX 6800S costs 86.7% less ($5199 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.6 (Quadro P6000) vs 19.8 (Radeon RX 6800S) — the Radeon RX 6800S offers 661.5% better value. The Radeon RX 6800S is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Radeon RX 6800S |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5999 | $800-87% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.6 | 19.8+662% |
| Codename | GP102 | Navi 23 |
| Release | October 1 2016 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #141 | #135 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













