
GeForce GTX 1080
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7700S
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1080
2016Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌33.4% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$449 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.1 vs 34.6 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌80% higher power demand at 180W vs 100W.
Radeon RX 7700S
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 32.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 34.6 vs 26.1 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 180W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GeForce GTX 1080
2016Radeon RX 7700S
2023Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 32.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 34.6 vs 26.1 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 180W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌33.4% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$449 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.1 vs 34.6 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌80% higher power demand at 180W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1080 better than Radeon RX 7700S?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 7700S make more sense than GeForce GTX 1080?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 48 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 289 FPS | 369 FPS |
| medium | 242 FPS | 313 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 196 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 55 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 702 FPS | 699 FPS |
| medium | 562 FPS | 559 FPS |
| high | 468 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 527 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 351 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 233 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 175 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 399 FPS | 600 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 512 FPS |
| high | 281 FPS | 440 FPS |
| ultra | 241 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 332 FPS | 463 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 392 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 319 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 256 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 290 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 267 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 175 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1080 and Radeon RX 7700S

GeForce GTX 1080
GeForce GTX 1080
The GeForce GTX 1080 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,609 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon RX 7700S
Radeon RX 7700S
The Radeon RX 7700S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2500 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,527 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1080 scores 15,609 and the Radeon RX 7700S reaches 15,527 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1080 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 7700S uses RDNA 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7700S). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 20.48 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7700S). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2500 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,609 | 15,527 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 20.48 TFLOPS+131% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 2500 MHz+44% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+25% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+88% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7700S is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1080 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 1080 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7700S relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 320 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 7700S) — a 11.1% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1080. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 320 GB/s+11% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (Radeon RX 7700S). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1080) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7700S). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 1080) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 7700S).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1080 draws 180W versus the Radeon RX 7700S's 100W — a 57.1% difference. The Radeon RX 7700S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 650W (Radeon RX 7700S). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 100W-44% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 86.7 | 155.3+79% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1080 launched at $599 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7700S launched at $449. The Radeon RX 7700S costs 25% less ($150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 26.1 (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 34.6 (Radeon RX 7700S) — the Radeon RX 7700S offers 32.6% better value. The Radeon RX 7700S is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $449-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.1 | 34.6+33% |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 33 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | January 4 2023 |
| Ranking | #137 | #140 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













