
Quadro RTX A6000
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro RTX A6000
2020Why buy it
- ✅54.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 16 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7700 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌935.4% HIGHER MSRP$4,649 MSRPvs$449 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 49.3 G3D/$ ($4,649 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌57.9% higher power demand at 300W vs 190W.
Radeon RX 7700
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,200 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 905.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.3 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 190W instead of 300W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX A6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quadro RTX A6000
2020Radeon RX 7700
2023Why buy it
- ✅54.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 16 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,200 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 905.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.3 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 190W instead of 300W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7700 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌935.4% HIGHER MSRP$4,649 MSRPvs$449 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 49.3 G3D/$ ($4,649 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌57.9% higher power demand at 300W vs 190W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX A6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro RTX A6000 better than Radeon RX 7700?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 7700 make more sense than Quadro RTX A6000?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro RTX A6000 | Radeon RX 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 250 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 209 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 167 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 150 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 175 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 75 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro RTX A6000 | Radeon RX 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 661 FPS | 374 FPS |
| medium | 555 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 420 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 361 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 417 FPS | 197 FPS |
| high | 331 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 255 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 220 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 188 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro RTX A6000 | Radeon RX 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 929 FPS | 838 FPS |
| medium | 759 FPS | 684 FPS |
| high | 675 FPS | 600 FPS |
| ultra | 513 FPS | 498 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 716 FPS | 643 FPS |
| medium | 586 FPS | 520 FPS |
| high | 509 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 374 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 493 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 355 FPS |
| high | 342 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 256 FPS | 240 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro RTX A6000 | Radeon RX 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 602 FPS |
| medium | 784 FPS | 514 FPS |
| high | 684 FPS | 441 FPS |
| ultra | 513 FPS | 352 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 679 FPS | 465 FPS |
| medium | 616 FPS | 394 FPS |
| high | 513 FPS | 320 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 258 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 410 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 342 FPS | 232 FPS |
| ultra | 256 FPS | 189 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX A6000 and Radeon RX 7700

Quadro RTX A6000
Quadro RTX A6000
The Quadro RTX A6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1800 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,798 points. Launch price was $4,649.

Radeon RX 7700
Radeon RX 7700
The Radeon RX 7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,146 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX A6000 scores 22,798 and the Radeon RX 7700 reaches 22,146 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX A6000 is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 7700 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 10,752 (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7700). Raw compute: 38.71 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 20.48 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7700). Boost clocks: 1800 MHz vs 2600 MHz. Ray tracing: 84 RT cores (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 32 (Radeon RX 7700) with 336 Tensor cores.
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | Radeon RX 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,798+3% | 22,146 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 10752+425% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 38.71 TFLOPS+89% | 20.48 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1800 MHz | 2600 MHz+44% |
| ROPs | 112+75% | 64 |
| TMUs | 336+163% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 10.5 MB+2000% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+200% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 84+163% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7700 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro RTX A6000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The Quadro RTX A6000 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | Radeon RX 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX A6000 comes with 48 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7700 has 16 GB. The Quadro RTX A6000 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 624 GB/s (Radeon RX 7700) — a 23.1% advantage for the Quadro RTX A6000. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7700) — the Quadro RTX A6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | Radeon RX 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+200% | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 768 GB/s+23% | 624 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+200% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | Radeon RX 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (7th Gen) (Quadro RTX A6000) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7700). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Quadro RTX A6000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7700).
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | Radeon RX 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (7th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX A6000 draws 300W versus the Radeon RX 7700's 190W — a 44.9% difference. The Radeon RX 7700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 650W (Radeon RX 7700). Power connectors: 8-pin EPS vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | Radeon RX 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 190W-37% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin EPS | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 76.0 | 116.6+53% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro RTX A6000 launched at $4649 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7700 launched at $449. The Radeon RX 7700 costs 90.3% less ($4200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.9 (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 49.3 (Radeon RX 7700) — the Radeon RX 7700 offers 906.1% better value. The Radeon RX 7700 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | Radeon RX 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4649 | $449-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.9 | 49.3+906% |
| Codename | GA102 | Navi 33 |
| Release | October 5 2020 | January 4 2023 |
| Ranking | #54 | #140 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












