
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7600M XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $29 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 120W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7600M XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Radeon RX 7600M XT
2023Why buy it
- ✅7.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌9.7% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌140% higher power demand at 120W vs 50W.
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
2023Radeon RX 7600M XT
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $29 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 120W, a 70W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅7.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7600M XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌9.7% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌140% higher power demand at 120W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 7600M XT better than GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile make more sense than Radeon RX 7600M XT?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 296 FPS | 321 FPS |
| medium | 245 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 188 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 645 FPS | 660 FPS |
| medium | 516 FPS | 528 FPS |
| high | 430 FPS | 440 FPS |
| ultra | 322 FPS | 330 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 316 FPS | 330 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 248 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 321 FPS | 330 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 264 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 220 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 165 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 431 FPS |
| medium | 424 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 321 FPS |
| ultra | 322 FPS | 250 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 334 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 293 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 187 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 203 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 185 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 132 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile and Radeon RX 7600M XT

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1455 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,332 points.

Radeon RX 7600M XT
Radeon RX 7600M XT
The Radeon RX 7600M XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1280 MHz to 2469 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,669 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile scores 14,332 and the Radeon RX 7600M XT reaches 14,669 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 7600M XT uses RDNA 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600M XT). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 20.23 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600M XT). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 2469 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 32 (Radeon RX 7600M XT) with 80 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,332 | 14,669+2% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS | 20.23 TFLOPS+125% |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz | 2469 MHz+41% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+400% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+500% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 32+60% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 7600M XT relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7600M XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 7600M XT) — a 50% advantage for the Radeon RX 7600M XT. Bus width: 96-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 12 MB (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600M XT) — the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 288 GB/s+50% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 128-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+500% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 7600M XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600M XT). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 7600M XT).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile draws 50W versus the Radeon RX 7600M XT's 120W — a 82.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 500W (Radeon RX 7600M XT). Power connectors: Mobile vs Mobile. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-58% | 120W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 286.6+135% | 122.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile launched at $300 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7600M XT launched at $329. The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile costs 8.8% less ($29 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 44.6 (Radeon RX 7600M XT) — the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile offers 7.2% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-9% | $329 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+7% | 44.6 |
| Codename | AD107 | Navi 33 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | January 4 2023 |
| Ranking | #166 | #160 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













