
Radeon PRO V710
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon PRO V710
2024Why buy it
- ✅19.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌905% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 58.6 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌267.4% higher power demand at 158W vs 43W.
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
Radeon RX 7400
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,801 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 876% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 58.6 vs 6.0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Draws 43W instead of 158W, a 115W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO V710 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Radeon PRO V710
2024Radeon RX 7400
2025Why buy it
- ✅19.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,801 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 876% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 58.6 vs 6.0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Draws 43W instead of 158W, a 115W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌905% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 58.6 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌267.4% higher power demand at 158W vs 43W.
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO V710 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO V710 better than Radeon RX 7400?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 7400 make more sense than Radeon PRO V710?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO V710 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 136 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO V710 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 337 FPS |
| medium | 416 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 270 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 341 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon PRO V710 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 270 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 270 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 202 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 216 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 180 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 131 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon PRO V710 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 270 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 270 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 202 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 216 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 180 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 131 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO V710 and Radeon RX 7400

Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710
The Radeon PRO V710 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 3 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3456 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 54 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,000 points.

Radeon RX 7400
Radeon RX 7400
The Radeon RX 7400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,654 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO V710 scores 12,000 and the Radeon RX 7400 reaches 11,654 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO V710 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon RX 7400 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 3,456 (Radeon PRO V710) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 7400). Raw compute: 27.65 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO V710) vs 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7400). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 2300 MHz. Ray tracing: 54 RT cores (Radeon PRO V710) vs 28 (Radeon RX 7400).
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,000+3% | 11,654 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 3456+93% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 27.65 TFLOPS+68% | 16.49 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz | 2300 MHz+15% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 216+93% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR 3 + AFMF |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 54+93% | 28 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7400 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO V710 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7400). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7400). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7400).
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO V710 draws 158W versus the Radeon RX 7400's 43W — a 114.4% difference. The Radeon RX 7400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO V710) vs 450W (Radeon RX 7400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 158W | 43W-73% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 75.9 | 271.0+257% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO V710 launched at $2000 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7400 launched at $199. The Radeon RX 7400 costs 90% less ($1801 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.0 (Radeon PRO V710) vs 58.6 (Radeon RX 7400) — the Radeon RX 7400 offers 876.7% better value. The Radeon RX 7400 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2024).
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000 | $199-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.0 | 58.6+877% |
| Codename | Navi 32 | Navi 33 |
| Release | October 3 2024 | August 8 2025 |
| Ranking | #196 | #229 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













