
Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6850M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
2019Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 120W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6850M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Radeon RX 6850M
2022Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌50% higher power demand at 120W vs 80W.
Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
2019Radeon RX 6850M
2022Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 120W, a 40W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6850M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌50% higher power demand at 120W vs 80W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 6850M better than Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon RX 6850M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 50 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon RX 6850M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 317 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 267 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 165 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon RX 6850M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 548 FPS | 552 FPS |
| medium | 438 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 365 FPS | 368 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 411 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 331 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 205 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 219 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 183 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 138 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon RX 6850M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 303 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 262 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 217 FPS | 333 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 224 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 313 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 202 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 126 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design and Radeon RX 6850M

Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1380 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,173 points.

Radeon RX 6850M
Radeon RX 6850M
The Radeon RX 6850M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2416 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,274 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design scores 12,173 and the Radeon RX 6850M reaches 12,274 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 6850M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 6850M). Raw compute: 7.066 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) vs 8.659 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6850M). Boost clocks: 1380 MHz vs 2416 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) vs 28 (Radeon RX 6850M) with 320 Tensor cores.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon RX 6850M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,173 | 12,274 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+43% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.066 TFLOPS | 8.659 TFLOPS+23% |
| Boost Clock | 1380 MHz | 2416 MHz+75% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+43% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+400% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40+43% | 28 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 6850M relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6850M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon RX 6850M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 6850M) — the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon RX 6850M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6850M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon RX 6850M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6850M). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6850M).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon RX 6850M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design draws 80W versus the Radeon RX 6850M's 120W — a 40% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) vs 500W (Radeon RX 6850M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon RX 6850M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-33% | 120W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 152.2+49% | 102.3 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













