
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅2.1% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 18% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 38.1 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $579 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 250W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌26.7% longer card at 304mm vs 240mm.
Radeon RX 6800
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($579 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 304mm, a 64mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 38.1 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($579 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌25% higher power demand at 250W vs 200W.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Radeon RX 6800
2020Why buy it
- ✅2.1% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 18% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 38.1 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $579 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 250W, a 50W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($579 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 304mm, a 64mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌26.7% longer card at 304mm vs 240mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 38.1 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($579 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌25% higher power demand at 250W vs 200W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than Radeon RX 6800?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 6800 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 161 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 83 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 436 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 346 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 283 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 84 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 901 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 734 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 637 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 496 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 691 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 471 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 372 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 391 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 248 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 641 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 547 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 481 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 434 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 462 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 395 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 343 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 243 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Radeon RX 6800

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon RX 6800
Radeon RX 6800
The Radeon RX 6800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,056 points. Launch price was $579.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Radeon RX 6800's 22,056 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 22%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 6800 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 3,840 (Radeon RX 6800). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 16.17 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6800). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 2105 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 60 (Radeon RX 6800) with 184 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+22% | 22,056 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+53% | 3840 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+80% | 16.17 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+18% | 2105 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 184 | 240+30% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+673% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+800% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 60+30% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4070 uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 6800 relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6800 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6800 has 16 GB. The Radeon RX 6800 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon RX 6800) — a 1.6% advantage for the Radeon RX 6800. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 6800) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | 512 GB/s+2% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+800% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6800). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 6800). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6800).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Radeon RX 6800's 250W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 650W (Radeon RX 6800). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 304mm vs 240mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-20% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 304mm | 240mm |
| Height | 137mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+53% | 88.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6800 launched at $579. The Radeon RX 6800 costs 3.3% less ($20 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 38.1 (Radeon RX 6800) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 17.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $579-3% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+18% | 38.1 |
| Codename | AD104 | Navi 21 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #32 | #65 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












