
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB
Popular choices:

RTX A4000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $842 less on MSRP ($269 MSRP vs $1,111 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 298.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 69.8 vs 17.5 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs $1,111 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4000 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 10 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌21.4% higher power demand at 170W vs 140W.
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
RTX A4000
2021Why buy it
- ✅15.0% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅60% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 10 GB).
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 170W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌313% HIGHER MSRP$1,111 MSRPvs$269 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.5 vs 69.8 G3D/$ ($1,111 MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB
2023RTX A4000
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $842 less on MSRP ($269 MSRP vs $1,111 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 298.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 69.8 vs 17.5 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs $1,111 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅15.0% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅60% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 10 GB).
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 170W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4000 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 10 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌21.4% higher power demand at 170W vs 140W.
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌313% HIGHER MSRP$1,111 MSRPvs$269 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.5 vs 69.8 G3D/$ ($1,111 MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX A4000 better than Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB make more sense than RTX A4000?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 432 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 357 FPS | 219 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 271 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 223 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 185 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 151 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 844 FPS | 873 FPS |
| medium | 676 FPS | 701 FPS |
| high | 563 FPS | 584 FPS |
| ultra | 423 FPS | 438 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 634 FPS | 657 FPS |
| medium | 507 FPS | 526 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 317 FPS | 328 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 423 FPS | 438 FPS |
| medium | 338 FPS | 350 FPS |
| high | 282 FPS | 292 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 219 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 679 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 564 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 474 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 402 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 528 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 440 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 358 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 250 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 73 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB and RTX A4000

Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB
The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1941 MHz to 2450 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,783 points. Launch price was $309.

RTX A4000
RTX A4000
The RTX A4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,463 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB scores 18,783 and the RTX A4000 reaches 19,463 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX A4000 uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB) vs 6,144 (RTX A4000). Raw compute: 11.29 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000). Boost clocks: 2450 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB) vs 48 (RTX A4000) vs 192.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 18,783 | 19,463+4% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 6144+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.29 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS+70% |
| Boost Clock | 2450 MHz+57% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 144 | 192+33% |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 6 MB+1100% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36 | 48+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A4000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX A4000 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB comes with 10 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4000 has 16 GB. The RTX A4000 offers 60% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 320 GB/s (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4000) — a 40% advantage for the RTX A4000. Bus width: 160-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB) vs 4 MB (RTX A4000) — the RTX A4000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 10 GB | 16 GB+60% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 448 GB/s+40% |
| Bus Width | 160-bit | 192-bit+20% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A4000). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4000).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB draws 170W versus the RTX A4000's 140W — a 19.4% difference. The RTX A4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB) vs 650W (RTX A4000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 140W-18% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | 110mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 110.5 | 139.0+26% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB launched at $269 MSRP, while the RTX A4000 launched at $1111. The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB costs 75.8% less ($842 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 69.8 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB) vs 17.5 (RTX A4000) — the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB offers 298.9% better value. The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $269-76% | $1111 |
| Performance per Dollar | 69.8+299% | 17.5 |
| Codename | Navi 22 | GA104 |
| Release | October 17 2023 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #93 | #85 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












