Quadro RTX 8000 vs Radeon RX 6700 XT

NVIDIA

Quadro RTX 8000

2018Core: 1395 MHzBoost: 1770 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon RX 6700 XT

2021Core: 2321 MHzBoost: 2581 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro RTX 8000

2018

Why buy it

  • 31.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 12 GB).

Trade-offs

  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 48 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
  • 1987.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $9,999 MSRPvs$479 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 41.2 G3D/$ ($9,999 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).

Radeon RX 6700 XT

2021

Why buy it

  • Costs $9,520 less on MSRP ($479 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1969.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 41.2 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($479 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 8000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro RTX 8000 better than Radeon RX 6700 XT?
Yes. Quadro RTX 8000 is clearly the better overall GPU here. Quadro RTX 8000 averages 31.6% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 19,927 vs 19,754 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Quadro RTX 8000 is a 2018 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon RX 6700 XT is a 2021 model from an older upper-mid-range class with FSR 3 + AFMF. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 6700 XT is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2021 generation instead of 2018, better upscaling support with FSR 3 (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 7nm process instead of 12nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Quadro RTX 8000 is about 1987.5% more expensive on MSRP at $9,999 MSRP versus $479 MSRP, and you are getting 31.6% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 0.9% higher G3D Mark. Radeon RX 6700 XT still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Quadro RTX 8000 is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, Radeon RX 6700 XT still makes more sense on price alone, but the performance trade-off is much harder to justify by current standards.
When does Radeon RX 6700 XT make more sense than Quadro RTX 8000?
Yes. Radeon RX 6700 XT is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, future-proofing, and staying closer to $479 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro RTX 8000. The trade-off is that Quadro RTX 8000 currently gives you 0.9% higher G3D Mark and 31.6% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. Radeon RX 6700 XT still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetQuadro RTX 8000Radeon RX 6700 XT
1080p
low205 FPS179 FPS
medium190 FPS159 FPS
high166 FPS145 FPS
ultra151 FPS122 FPS
1440p
low187 FPS145 FPS
medium158 FPS117 FPS
high130 FPS108 FPS
ultra121 FPS97 FPS
4K
low119 FPS87 FPS
medium100 FPS73 FPS
high77 FPS60 FPS
ultra70 FPS52 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetQuadro RTX 8000Radeon RX 6700 XT
1080p
low499 FPS479 FPS
medium442 FPS405 FPS
high343 FPS326 FPS
ultra289 FPS274 FPS
1440p
low325 FPS298 FPS
medium274 FPS246 FPS
high223 FPS206 FPS
ultra183 FPS173 FPS
4K
low153 FPS131 FPS
medium135 FPS112 FPS
high113 FPS91 FPS
ultra90 FPS70 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetQuadro RTX 8000Radeon RX 6700 XT
1080p
low897 FPS867 FPS
medium717 FPS705 FPS
high598 FPS593 FPS
ultra448 FPS444 FPS
1440p
low673 FPS663 FPS
medium538 FPS532 FPS
high448 FPS444 FPS
ultra336 FPS333 FPS
4K
low448 FPS444 FPS
medium359 FPS356 FPS
high299 FPS296 FPS
ultra224 FPS222 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetQuadro RTX 8000Radeon RX 6700 XT
1080p
low673 FPS703 FPS
medium605 FPS585 FPS
high515 FPS491 FPS
ultra448 FPS412 FPS
1440p
low544 FPS541 FPS
medium487 FPS451 FPS
high418 FPS367 FPS
ultra336 FPS308 FPS
4K
low355 FPS322 FPS
medium323 FPS285 FPS
high297 FPS257 FPS
ultra224 FPS210 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 8000 and Radeon RX 6700 XT

NVIDIA

Quadro RTX 8000

The Quadro RTX 8000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,927 points. Launch price was $9,999.

AMD

Radeon RX 6700 XT

The Radeon RX 6700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2321 MHz to 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,754 points. Launch price was $479.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro RTX 8000 scores 19,927 and the Radeon RX 6700 XT reaches 19,754 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 8000 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 6700 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 2,560 (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Raw compute: 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 13.21 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 2581 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 40 (Radeon RX 6700 XT) with 576 Tensor cores.

FeatureQuadro RTX 8000Radeon RX 6700 XT
G3D Mark Score
19,927
19,754
Architecture
Turing
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
12 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
4608+80%
2560
Compute (TFLOPS)
16.31 TFLOPS+23%
13.21 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
2581 MHz+46%
ROPs
96+50%
64
TMUs
288+80%
160
L1 Cache
4.5 MB+800%
0.5 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB+100%
3 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
72+80%
40

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6700 XT is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro RTX 8000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The Quadro RTX 8000 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6700 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureQuadro RTX 8000Radeon RX 6700 XT
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR 3
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro RTX 8000 comes with 48 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6700 XT has 12 GB. The Quadro RTX 8000 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 384 GB/s (Radeon RX 6700 XT) — a 100% advantage for the Quadro RTX 8000. Bus width: 384-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 6700 XT) — the Quadro RTX 8000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro RTX 8000Radeon RX 6700 XT
VRAM Capacity
48 GB+300%
12 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
768 GB/s+100%
384 GB/s
Bus Width
384-bit+100%
192-bit
L2 Cache
6 MB+100%
3 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro RTX 8000Radeon RX 6700 XT
DirectX
12.2+2%
12 Ultimate
Vulkan
1.2
1.4+17%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs VCE (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP10 vs UVD. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (Radeon RX 6700 XT).

FeatureQuadro RTX 8000Radeon RX 6700 XT
Encoder
NVENC 7.0
VCE
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP10
UVD
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro RTX 8000 draws 260W versus the Radeon RX 6700 XT's 230W — a 12.2% difference. The Radeon RX 6700 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 650W (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

FeatureQuadro RTX 8000Radeon RX 6700 XT
TDP
260W
230W-12%
Recommended PSU
650W
650W
Power Connector
1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin
6-pin + 8-pin
Length
267mm
267mm
Height
111mm
110mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
75°C-6%
Perf/Watt
76.6
85.9+12%
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro RTX 8000 launched at $9999 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6700 XT launched at $479. The Radeon RX 6700 XT costs 95.2% less ($9520 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.0 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 41.2 (Radeon RX 6700 XT) — the Radeon RX 6700 XT offers 1960% better value. The Radeon RX 6700 XT is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2018).

FeatureQuadro RTX 8000Radeon RX 6700 XT
MSRP
$9999
$479-95%
Performance per Dollar
2.0
41.2+1960%
Codename
TU102
Navi 22
Release
August 13 2018
March 3 2021
Ranking
#78
#80