
Quadro RTX 8000
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6700 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro RTX 8000
2018Why buy it
- ✅31.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 48 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌1987.5% HIGHER MSRP$9,999 MSRPvs$479 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 41.2 G3D/$ ($9,999 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
Radeon RX 6700 XT
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $9,520 less on MSRP ($479 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1969.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 41.2 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($479 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 8000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quadro RTX 8000
2018Radeon RX 6700 XT
2021Why buy it
- ✅31.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 12 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $9,520 less on MSRP ($479 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1969.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 41.2 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($479 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 48 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌1987.5% HIGHER MSRP$9,999 MSRPvs$479 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 41.2 G3D/$ ($9,999 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 8000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro RTX 8000 better than Radeon RX 6700 XT?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 6700 XT make more sense than Quadro RTX 8000?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 205 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 166 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 151 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 130 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 52 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 326 FPS |
| ultra | 289 FPS | 274 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 325 FPS | 298 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 70 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 897 FPS | 867 FPS |
| medium | 717 FPS | 705 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 593 FPS |
| ultra | 448 FPS | 444 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 673 FPS | 663 FPS |
| medium | 538 FPS | 532 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 444 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 333 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 448 FPS | 444 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 299 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 222 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 673 FPS | 703 FPS |
| medium | 605 FPS | 585 FPS |
| high | 515 FPS | 491 FPS |
| ultra | 448 FPS | 412 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 541 FPS |
| medium | 487 FPS | 451 FPS |
| high | 418 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 308 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 355 FPS | 322 FPS |
| medium | 323 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 297 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 210 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 8000 and Radeon RX 6700 XT

Quadro RTX 8000
Quadro RTX 8000
The Quadro RTX 8000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,927 points. Launch price was $9,999.

Radeon RX 6700 XT
Radeon RX 6700 XT
The Radeon RX 6700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2321 MHz to 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,754 points. Launch price was $479.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 8000 scores 19,927 and the Radeon RX 6700 XT reaches 19,754 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 8000 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 6700 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 2,560 (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Raw compute: 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 13.21 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 2581 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 40 (Radeon RX 6700 XT) with 576 Tensor cores.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,927 | 19,754 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608+80% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.31 TFLOPS+23% | 13.21 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz | 2581 MHz+46% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 288+80% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB+800% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+100% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 72+80% | 40 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6700 XT is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro RTX 8000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The Quadro RTX 8000 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6700 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 8000 comes with 48 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6700 XT has 12 GB. The Quadro RTX 8000 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 384 GB/s (Radeon RX 6700 XT) — a 100% advantage for the Quadro RTX 8000. Bus width: 384-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 6700 XT) — the Quadro RTX 8000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+300% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 768 GB/s+100% | 384 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+100% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs VCE (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP10 vs UVD. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (Radeon RX 6700 XT).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7.0 | VCE |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP10 | UVD |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 8000 draws 260W versus the Radeon RX 6700 XT's 230W — a 12.2% difference. The Radeon RX 6700 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 650W (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 260W | 230W-12% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 76.6 | 85.9+12% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro RTX 8000 launched at $9999 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6700 XT launched at $479. The Radeon RX 6700 XT costs 95.2% less ($9520 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.0 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 41.2 (Radeon RX 6700 XT) — the Radeon RX 6700 XT offers 1960% better value. The Radeon RX 6700 XT is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $9999 | $479-95% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.0 | 41.2+1960% |
| Codename | TU102 | Navi 22 |
| Release | August 13 2018 | March 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #78 | #80 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












