
L40S
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6700 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
L40S
2022Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌1465.8% HIGHER MSRP$7,500 MSRPvs$479 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 41.2 G3D/$ ($7,500 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
- ❌30.4% higher power demand at 300W vs 230W.
Radeon RX 6700 XT
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $7,021 less on MSRP ($479 MSRP vs $7,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1444.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 41.2 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($479 MSRP vs $7,500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Draws 230W instead of 300W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
L40S
2022Radeon RX 6700 XT
2021Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $7,021 less on MSRP ($479 MSRP vs $7,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1444.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 41.2 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($479 MSRP vs $7,500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Draws 230W instead of 300W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌1465.8% HIGHER MSRP$7,500 MSRPvs$479 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 41.2 G3D/$ ($7,500 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
- ❌30.4% higher power demand at 300W vs 230W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is L40S better than Radeon RX 6700 XT?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 6700 XT make more sense than L40S?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | L40S | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 287 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 256 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 256 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 52 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | L40S | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 784 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 629 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 478 FPS | 326 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 274 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 646 FPS | 298 FPS |
| medium | 528 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 411 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 332 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 338 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 273 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 240 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 70 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | L40S | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 901 FPS | 867 FPS |
| medium | 721 FPS | 705 FPS |
| high | 601 FPS | 593 FPS |
| ultra | 451 FPS | 444 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 676 FPS | 663 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 532 FPS |
| high | 451 FPS | 444 FPS |
| ultra | 338 FPS | 333 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 451 FPS | 444 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 300 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 222 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | L40S | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 483 FPS | 703 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 585 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 491 FPS |
| ultra | 288 FPS | 412 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 345 FPS | 541 FPS |
| medium | 312 FPS | 451 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 308 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 224 FPS | 322 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 210 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of L40S and Radeon RX 6700 XT

L40S
L40S
The L40S is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 13 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 18176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 142 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,023 points.

Radeon RX 6700 XT
Radeon RX 6700 XT
The Radeon RX 6700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2321 MHz to 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,754 points. Launch price was $479.
Graphics Performance
The L40S scores 20,023 and the Radeon RX 6700 XT reaches 19,754 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The L40S is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 6700 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 18,176 (L40S) vs 2,560 (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Raw compute: 91.61 TFLOPS (L40S) vs 13.21 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Boost clocks: 2520 MHz vs 2581 MHz. Ray tracing: 142 RT cores (L40S) vs 40 (Radeon RX 6700 XT) with 568 Tensor cores.
| Feature | L40S | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,023+1% | 19,754 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 18176+610% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 91.61 TFLOPS+593% | 13.21 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2520 MHz | 2581 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 192+200% | 64 |
| TMUs | 568+255% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 17.8 MB+3460% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1500% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 142+255% | 40 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6700 XT is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The L40S lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | L40S | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The L40S comes with 48 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6700 XT has 12 GB. The L40S offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 960 GB/s (L40S) vs 384 GB/s (Radeon RX 6700 XT) — a 150% advantage for the L40S. Bus width: 384-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (L40S) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 6700 XT) — the L40S has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | L40S | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+300% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 960 GB/s+150% | 384 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1500% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (L40S) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | L40S | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th Gen (L40S) vs VCE (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs UVD. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1 (L40S) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (Radeon RX 6700 XT).
| Feature | L40S | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th Gen | VCE |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | UVD |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The L40S draws 300W versus the Radeon RX 6700 XT's 230W — a 26.4% difference. The Radeon RX 6700 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 800W (L40S) vs 650W (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Power connectors: 16-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | L40S | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 230W-23% |
| Recommended PSU | 800W | 650W-19% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 66.7 | 85.9+29% |
Value Analysis
The L40S launched at $7500 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6700 XT launched at $479. The Radeon RX 6700 XT costs 93.6% less ($7021 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.7 (L40S) vs 41.2 (Radeon RX 6700 XT) — the Radeon RX 6700 XT offers 1425.9% better value. The L40S is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | L40S | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7500 | $479-94% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.7 | 41.2+1426% |
| Codename | AD102 | Navi 22 |
| Release | October 13 2022 | March 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #76 | #80 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












