
Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6650M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Newer upscaling generation: DLSS 4 Super Resolution (2025) vs FSR 3 (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6650M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Radeon RX 6650M
2022Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,299 MSRP).
Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)
2019Radeon RX 6650M
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Newer upscaling generation: DLSS 4 Super Resolution (2025) vs FSR 3 (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6650M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) better than Radeon RX 6650M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 6650M make more sense than Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 208 FPS |
| medium | 194 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 167 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 53 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 267 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 113 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 553 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 461 FPS | 455 FPS |
| ultra | 346 FPS | 341 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 519 FPS | 512 FPS |
| medium | 415 FPS | 410 FPS |
| high | 346 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 256 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 346 FPS | 341 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 273 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 171 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 321 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 423 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 294 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 237 FPS | 389 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 130 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) and Radeon RX 6650M

Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)
Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)
The Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,372 points.

Radeon RX 6650M
Radeon RX 6650M
The Radeon RX 6650M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2416 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,171 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) scores 15,372 and the Radeon RX 6650M reaches 15,171 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 6650M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 6650M). Raw compute: 9.492 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)) vs 8.659 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6650M). Boost clocks: 1545 MHz vs 2416 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)) vs 28 (Radeon RX 6650M) with 384 Tensor cores.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,372+1% | 15,171 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+71% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.492 TFLOPS+10% | 8.659 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1545 MHz | 2416 MHz+56% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 192+71% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+500% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48+71% | 28 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) uses DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 6650M relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6650M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 4 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 4) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6650M has 8 GB. The Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 6650M) — the Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6650M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6650M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP10 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6650M).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP10 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) draws 110W versus the Radeon RX 6650M's 120W — a 8.7% difference. The Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)) vs 650W (Radeon RX 6650M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W-8% | 120W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 139.7+11% | 126.4 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6650M is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2299 | — |
| Codename | TU104 | Navi 23 |
| Release | May 27 2019 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #181 | #148 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












