
GeForce GTX 1080
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6650M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1080
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌50% higher power demand at 180W vs 120W.
Radeon RX 6650M
2022Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 180W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1080
2016Radeon RX 6650M
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 180W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌50% higher power demand at 180W vs 120W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1080 better than Radeon RX 6650M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 6650M make more sense than GeForce GTX 1080?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 289 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 242 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 702 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 562 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 468 FPS | 455 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 341 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 527 FPS | 512 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 410 FPS |
| high | 351 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 256 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 341 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 273 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 171 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 399 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 423 FPS |
| high | 281 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 241 FPS | 294 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 332 FPS | 389 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 130 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1080 and Radeon RX 6650M

GeForce GTX 1080
GeForce GTX 1080
The GeForce GTX 1080 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,609 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon RX 6650M
Radeon RX 6650M
The Radeon RX 6650M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2416 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,171 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1080 scores 15,609 and the Radeon RX 6650M reaches 15,171 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1080 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 6650M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 6650M). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 8.659 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6650M). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2416 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,609+3% | 15,171 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+43% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+2% | 8.659 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 2416 MHz+39% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+43% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+88% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6650M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1080 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 1080 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6650M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 320 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 6650M) — a 42.9% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1080. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 320 GB/s+43% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6650M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1080) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6650M). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 1080) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6650M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1080 draws 180W versus the Radeon RX 6650M's 120W — a 40% difference. The Radeon RX 6650M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 650W (Radeon RX 6650M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 120W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 86.7 | 126.4+46% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6650M is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | — |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 23 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #137 | #148 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













