
Radeon RX 6600S
Popular choices:

RTX A3000 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 6600S
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 32.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
RTX A3000 Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6600S is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 32.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
Radeon RX 6600S
2022RTX A3000 Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 32.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6600S is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 32.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 6600S better than RTX A3000 Mobile?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX A3000 Mobile still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 6600S | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 6600S | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 287 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 235 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 185 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 35 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 6600S | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 438 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 346 FPS | 382 FPS |
| ultra | 293 FPS | 286 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 347 FPS | 429 FPS |
| medium | 316 FPS | 343 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 215 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 143 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 6600S | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 327 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 261 FPS | 296 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 195 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 82 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6600S and RTX A3000 Mobile

Radeon RX 6600S
Radeon RX 6600S
The Radeon RX 6600S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,016 points.

RTX A3000 Mobile
RTX A3000 Mobile
The RTX A3000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 1230 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,720 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6600S scores 13,016 and the RTX A3000 Mobile reaches 12,720 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6600S is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX A3000 Mobile uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon RX 6600S) vs 4,096 (RTX A3000 Mobile). Raw compute: 7.168 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6600S) vs 10.08 TFLOPS (RTX A3000 Mobile). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 1230 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Radeon RX 6600S) vs 32 (RTX A3000 Mobile) vs 128.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600S | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,016+2% | 12,720 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 4096+129% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.168 TFLOPS | 10.08 TFLOPS+41% |
| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz+63% | 1230 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 112 | 128+14% |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 32+14% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6600S is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A3000 Mobile lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX A3000 Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6600S relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600S | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 6600S comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A3000 Mobile has 8 GB. The RTX A3000 Mobile offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 6600S) vs 4 MB (RTX A3000 Mobile) — the RTX A3000 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600S | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_2 (Radeon RX 6600S) vs 12.2 (RTX A3000 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600S | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6600S) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A3000 Mobile). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 6600S) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A3000 Mobile).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600S | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6600S draws 80W versus the RTX A3000 Mobile's 70W — a 13.3% difference. The RTX A3000 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 6600S) vs 500W (RTX A3000 Mobile). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600S | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W | 70W-13% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 162.7 | 181.7+12% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6600S is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600S | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $400 | — |
| Codename | Navi 23 | GA104 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #200 | #205 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













