
GRID P40-2Q
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6550M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GRID P40-2Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌181.3% higher power demand at 225W vs 80W.
Radeon RX 6550M
2023Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 225W, a 145W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
GRID P40-2Q
2015Radeon RX 6550M
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 225W, a 145W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌181.3% higher power demand at 225W vs 80W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 6550M better than GRID P40-2Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GRID P40-2Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GRID P40-2Q | Radeon RX 6550M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 29 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GRID P40-2Q | Radeon RX 6550M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 26 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GRID P40-2Q | Radeon RX 6550M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 431 FPS | 335 FPS |
| medium | 345 FPS | 294 FPS |
| high | 287 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 216 FPS | 174 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 222 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 57 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GRID P40-2Q | Radeon RX 6550M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 55 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P40-2Q and Radeon RX 6550M

GRID P40-2Q
GRID P40-2Q
The GRID P40-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,581 points.

Radeon RX 6550M
Radeon RX 6550M
The Radeon RX 6550M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2840 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,705 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P40-2Q scores 9,581 and the Radeon RX 6550M reaches 9,705 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 6550M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P40-2Q) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 6550M). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-2Q) vs 5.816 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6550M). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 2840 MHz.
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | Radeon RX 6550M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,581 | 9,705+1% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+100% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS | 5.816 TFLOPS+21% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 2840 MHz+141% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+100% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6550M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GRID P40-2Q lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | Radeon RX 6550M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P40-2Q) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6550M) — the GRID P40-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | Radeon RX 6550M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GRID P40-2Q) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6550M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | Radeon RX 6550M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (2x) (GRID P40-2Q) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6550M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GRID P40-2Q) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon RX 6550M).
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | Radeon RX 6550M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 (2x) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P40-2Q draws 225W versus the Radeon RX 6550M's 80W — a 95.1% difference. The Radeon RX 6550M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GRID P40-2Q) vs 500W (Radeon RX 6550M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | Radeon RX 6550M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 80W-64% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 42.6 | 121.3+185% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6550M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | Radeon RX 6550M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5699 | — |
| Codename | GM204 | Navi 24 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | January 4 2023 |
| Ranking | #433 | #267 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













