
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6500M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
2017Why buy it
- ✅11.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.
Radeon RX 6500M
2022Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P4000 Max-Q across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
2017Radeon RX 6500M
2022Why buy it
- ✅11.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P4000 Max-Q across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro P4000 Max-Q better than Radeon RX 6500M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 6500M make more sense than Quadro P4000 Max-Q?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro P4000 Max-Q | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 29 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro P4000 Max-Q | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 180 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 24 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro P4000 Max-Q | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 338 FPS | 334 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 253 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 127 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 57 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro P4000 Max-Q | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 209 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 51 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P4000 Max-Q and Radeon RX 6500M

Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
The Quadro P4000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1114 MHz to 1228 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,500 points.

Radeon RX 6500M
Radeon RX 6500M
The Radeon RX 6500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,443 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P4000 Max-Q scores 7,500 and the Radeon RX 6500M reaches 7,443 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P4000 Max-Q is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 6500M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Quadro P4000 Max-Q) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 6500M). Raw compute: 4.401 TFLOPS (Quadro P4000 Max-Q) vs 4.915 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6500M). Boost clocks: 1228 MHz vs 2400 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 Max-Q | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,500 | 7,443 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+75% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.401 TFLOPS | 4.915 TFLOPS+12% |
| Boost Clock | 1228 MHz | 2400 MHz+95% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 112+75% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 672 KB+163% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6500M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P4000 Max-Q lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 Max-Q | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P4000 Max-Q) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6500M) — the Quadro P4000 Max-Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 Max-Q | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P4000 Max-Q) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 6500M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 Max-Q | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (Quadro P4000 Max-Q) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6500M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P4000 Max-Q) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon RX 6500M).
| Feature | Quadro P4000 Max-Q | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P4000 Max-Q draws 100W versus the Radeon RX 6500M's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon RX 6500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P4000 Max-Q) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6500M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 Max-Q | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 50W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 75.0 | 148.9+99% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












