
Radeon 8040S
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6500 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon 8040S
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 107W, a 52W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6500 XT across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌101% HIGHER MSRP$400 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 24.4 vs 48.3 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Radeon RX 6500 XT
2022Why buy it
- ✅17.1% more average FPS across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $201 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 97.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 48.3 vs 24.4 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌94.5% higher power demand at 107W vs 55W.
Radeon 8040S
2025Radeon RX 6500 XT
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 107W, a 52W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅17.1% more average FPS across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $201 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 97.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 48.3 vs 24.4 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6500 XT across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌101% HIGHER MSRP$400 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 24.4 vs 48.3 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌94.5% higher power demand at 107W vs 55W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 6500 XT better than Radeon 8040S?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon 8040S make more sense than Radeon RX 6500 XT?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon 8040S | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 45 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 29 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon 8040S | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 40 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 25 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon 8040S | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 320 FPS | 359 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 208 FPS | 257 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 70 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon 8040S | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 179 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 149 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 55 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 8040S and Radeon RX 6500 XT

Radeon 8040S
Radeon 8040S
The Radeon 8040S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2800 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,756 points.

Radeon RX 6500 XT
Radeon RX 6500 XT
The Radeon RX 6500 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2610 MHz to 2815 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 107W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,603 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 8040S scores 9,756 and the Radeon RX 6500 XT reaches 9,603 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 8040S is built on RDNA 3.5 while the Radeon RX 6500 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon 8040S) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Raw compute: 5.734 TFLOPS (Radeon 8040S) vs 5.765 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Boost clocks: 2800 MHz vs 2815 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (Radeon 8040S) vs 16 (Radeon RX 6500 XT).
| Feature | Radeon 8040S | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,756+2% | 9,603 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.734 TFLOPS | 5.765 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2800 MHz | 2815 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+700% | 1 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR 3 + AFMF |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6500 XT is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon 8040S lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon 8040S | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon 8040S) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6500 XT) — the Radeon 8040S has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 8040S | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 144 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+700% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon 8040S) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon 8040S | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.5 (Radeon 8040S) vs None (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Decoder: VCN 4.5 vs VCN 3.0 (Limited). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 8040S) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) (Radeon RX 6500 XT).
| Feature | Radeon 8040S | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.5 | None |
| Decoder | VCN 4.5 | VCN 3.0 (Limited) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 8040S draws 55W versus the Radeon RX 6500 XT's 107W — a 64.2% difference. The Radeon 8040S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon 8040S) vs 400W (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 172mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon 8040S | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W-49% | 107W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 400W-20% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 172mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 177.4+98% | 89.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 8040S launched at $400 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6500 XT launched at $199. The Radeon RX 6500 XT costs 50.2% less ($201 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 24.4 (Radeon 8040S) vs 48.3 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) — the Radeon RX 6500 XT offers 98% better value. The Radeon 8040S is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | Radeon 8040S | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $400 | $199-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.4 | 48.3+98% |
| Codename | Strix Halo | Navi 24 |
| Release | January 6 2025 | January 19 2022 |
| Ranking | #265 | #270 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













