
Radeon 8040S
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6550M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon 8040S
2025Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 80W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6550M across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
Radeon RX 6550M
2023Why buy it
- ✅10.7% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 24.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ❌45.5% higher power demand at 80W vs 55W.
Radeon 8040S
2025Radeon RX 6550M
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 80W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅10.7% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6550M across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 24.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ❌45.5% higher power demand at 80W vs 55W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 6550M better than Radeon 8040S?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon 8040S make more sense than Radeon RX 6550M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon 8040S | Radeon RX 6550M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 45 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 29 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon 8040S | Radeon RX 6550M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 40 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 26 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon 8040S | Radeon RX 6550M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 320 FPS | 335 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 294 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 174 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 208 FPS | 222 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 57 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon 8040S | Radeon RX 6550M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 325 FPS |
| medium | 179 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 149 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 59 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 8040S and Radeon RX 6550M

Radeon 8040S
Radeon 8040S
The Radeon 8040S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2800 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,756 points.

Radeon RX 6550M
Radeon RX 6550M
The Radeon RX 6550M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2840 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,705 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 8040S scores 9,756 and the Radeon RX 6550M reaches 9,705 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 8040S is built on RDNA 3.5 while the Radeon RX 6550M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon 8040S) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 6550M). Raw compute: 5.734 TFLOPS (Radeon 8040S) vs 5.816 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6550M). Boost clocks: 2800 MHz vs 2840 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (Radeon 8040S) vs 16 (Radeon RX 6550M).
| Feature | Radeon 8040S | Radeon RX 6550M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,756 | 9,705 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.734 TFLOPS | 5.816 TFLOPS+1% |
| Boost Clock | 2800 MHz | 2840 MHz+1% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+700% | 1 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR 3 + AFMF |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6550M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon 8040S lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon 8040S | Radeon RX 6550M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon 8040S) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6550M) — the Radeon 8040S has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 8040S | Radeon RX 6550M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 144 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+700% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon 8040S) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6550M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon 8040S | Radeon RX 6550M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.5 (Radeon 8040S) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6550M). Decoder: VCN 4.5 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 8040S) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon RX 6550M).
| Feature | Radeon 8040S | Radeon RX 6550M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.5 | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.5 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 8040S draws 55W versus the Radeon RX 6550M's 80W — a 37% difference. The Radeon 8040S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon 8040S) vs 500W (Radeon RX 6550M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon 8040S | Radeon RX 6550M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W-31% | 80W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 177.4+46% | 121.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 8040S is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | Radeon 8040S | Radeon RX 6550M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $400 | — |
| Codename | Strix Halo | Navi 24 |
| Release | January 6 2025 | January 4 2023 |
| Ranking | #265 | #267 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













