
Quadro P4000 (móvel)
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro P4000 (móvel)
2017Why buy it
- ✅50.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌311.6% HIGHER MSRP$819 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 38.2 G3D/$ ($819 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.
Radeon RX 6500
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $620 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $819 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 317.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $819 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Unknown architecture on Unknown node with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P4000 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Quadro P4000 (móvel)
2017Radeon RX 6500
Why buy it
- ✅50.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $620 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $819 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 317.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $819 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Unknown architecture on Unknown node with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌311.6% HIGHER MSRP$819 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 38.2 G3D/$ ($819 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P4000 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 6500 better than Quadro P4000 (móvel)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Quadro P4000 (móvel) make more sense than Radeon RX 6500?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 13 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 338 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 160 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 253 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 127 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 53 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P4000 (móvel) and Radeon RX 6500

Quadro P4000 (móvel)
Quadro P4000 (móvel)
The Quadro P4000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1227 MHz to 1228 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,500 points. Launch price was $819.61.

Radeon RX 6500
Radeon RX 6500
The Radeon RX 6500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in sem dados. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,610 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P4000 (móvel) scores 7,500 and the Radeon RX 6500 reaches 7,610 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,500 | 7,610+1% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6500 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P4000 (móvel) lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs None (Radeon RX 6500). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6500).
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (6th Gen) | None |
| Decoder | NVDEC (3rd Gen) | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P4000 (móvel) draws 100W versus the Radeon RX 6500's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon RX 6500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 400W (Radeon RX 6500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 172mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 75W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 172mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 75.0 | 101.5+35% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P4000 (móvel) launched at $819 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6500 launched at $199. The Radeon RX 6500 costs 75.7% less ($620 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.2 (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 38.2 (Radeon RX 6500) — the Radeon RX 6500 offers 315.2% better value.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $819 | $199-76% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.2 | 38.2+315% |
| Codename | GP104 | — |
| Release | January 11 2017 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #326 | #335 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












