
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅290.2% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 17.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 38.2 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.
- ❌76.7% longer card at 304mm vs 172mm.
Radeon RX 6500
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.
- ✅Measures 172mm instead of 304mm, a 132mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 38.2 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Radeon RX 6500
Why buy it
- ✅290.2% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 17.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 38.2 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.
- ✅Measures 172mm instead of 304mm, a 132mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.
- ❌76.7% longer card at 304mm vs 172mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 38.2 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than Radeon RX 6500?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 6500 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 13 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 160 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 53 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Radeon RX 6500

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon RX 6500
Radeon RX 6500
The Radeon RX 6500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in sem dados. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,610 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Radeon RX 6500's 7,610 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 253.7%.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+254% | 7,610 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4070 uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 6500 relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6500 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6500 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 144 GB/s (Radeon RX 6500) — a 250% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+200% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s+250% | 144 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs None (Radeon RX 6500). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6500).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | None |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Radeon RX 6500's 75W — a 90.9% difference. The Radeon RX 6500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 400W (Radeon RX 6500). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 304mm vs 172mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 75W-63% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 400W-38% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 304mm | 172mm |
| Height | 137mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+33% | 101.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6500 launched at $199. The Radeon RX 6500 costs 66.8% less ($400 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 38.2 (Radeon RX 6500) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 17.5% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $199-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+18% | 38.2 |
| Codename | AD104 | — |
| Release | April 12 2023 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #32 | #335 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












