
GeForce RTX 2050
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2050
2018Why buy it
- ✅106.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 34.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.4 vs 38.2 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌186.7% higher power demand at 215W vs 75W.
Radeon RX 6500
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Unknown architecture on Unknown node with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 215W, a 140W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2050 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌32.7% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 38.2 vs 51.4 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2050
2018Radeon RX 6500
Why buy it
- ✅106.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 34.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.4 vs 38.2 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Unknown architecture on Unknown node with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 215W, a 140W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌186.7% higher power demand at 215W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2050 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌32.7% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 38.2 vs 51.4 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2050 better than Radeon RX 6500?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 6500 make more sense than GeForce RTX 2050?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2050 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 56 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2050 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 347 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 244 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 13 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2050 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 347 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 160 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 260 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 208 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 53 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2050 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 255 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 208 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2050 and Radeon RX 6500

GeForce RTX 2050
GeForce RTX 2050
The GeForce RTX 2050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,714 points. Launch price was $699.

Radeon RX 6500
Radeon RX 6500
The Radeon RX 6500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in sem dados. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,610 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2050 scores 7,714 and the Radeon RX 6500 reaches 7,610 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,714+1% | 7,610 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6500 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 2050 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 2050 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6500 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 144 GB/s (Radeon RX 6500) — a 28.6% advantage for the Radeon RX 6500. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 144 GB/s+29% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8.0 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs None (Radeon RX 6500). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP11 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 2050) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6500).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8.0 | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP11 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2050 draws 215W versus the Radeon RX 6500's 75W — a 96.6% difference. The Radeon RX 6500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 400W (Radeon RX 6500). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 172mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 215W | 75W-65% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-25% | 400W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 172mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 35.9 | 101.5+183% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2050 launched at $150 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6500 launched at $199. The GeForce RTX 2050 costs 24.6% less ($49 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.4 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 38.2 (Radeon RX 6500) — the GeForce RTX 2050 offers 34.6% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-25% | $199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.4+35% | 38.2 |
| Codename | TU104 | — |
| Release | September 20 2018 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #94 | #335 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












