Radeon RX 6300M vs Radeon RX Vega M GH

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon RX 6300M

2022

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 35W instead of 100W, a 65W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX Vega M GH across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Radeon RX Vega M GH

2018

Why buy it

✅17.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌185.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 35W.

Radeon RX 6300M

2022

Radeon RX Vega M GH

2018

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 35W instead of 100W, a 65W reduction.

Why buy it

✅17.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX Vega M GH across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌185.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX Vega M GH better than Radeon RX 6300M?

Yes. Radeon RX Vega M GH is clearly the better overall GPU here. Radeon RX Vega M GH averages 17.3% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 6,548 vs 6,421 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon RX Vega M GH is a 2018 card with FSR upscaling, while Radeon RX 6300M is a 2022 model from an older generation with FSR 3 + AFMF. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6300M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2018, more VRAM at 4 GB instead of Unknown, better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of FSR upscaling, and a 6nm process instead of 14nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon RX Vega M GH is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 17.3% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 2.0% higher G3D Mark. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon RX Vega M GH is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, Radeon RX 6300M still makes more sense on price alone, but the performance trade-off is much harder to justify by current standards.

When does Radeon RX 6300M make more sense than Radeon RX Vega M GH?

Yes. Radeon RX 6300M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (35W vs 100W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon RX Vega M GH. The trade-off is that Radeon RX Vega M GH currently gives you 2.0% higher G3D Mark and 17.3% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon RX 6300M Benchmark Check

Radeon RX Vega M GH Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Radeon RX 6300M	Radeon RX Vega M GH
1080p
low	104 FPS	82 FPS
medium	92 FPS	70 FPS
high	79 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	66 FPS	40 FPS
1440p
low	94 FPS	72 FPS
medium	80 FPS	63 FPS
high	67 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	56 FPS	30 FPS
4K
low	45 FPS	26 FPS
medium	42 FPS	24 FPS
high	31 FPS	17 FPS
ultra	28 FPS	14 FPS

Open Radeon RX 6300M Open Radeon RX Vega M GH

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Radeon RX 6300M	Radeon RX Vega M GH
1080p
low	158 FPS	201 FPS
medium	124 FPS	168 FPS
high	92 FPS	126 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	93 FPS
1440p
low	104 FPS	148 FPS
medium	81 FPS	124 FPS
high	60 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	41 FPS	69 FPS
4K
low	53 FPS	78 FPS
medium	41 FPS	66 FPS
high	32 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	20 FPS	39 FPS

Open Radeon RX 6300M Open Radeon RX Vega M GH

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Radeon RX 6300M	Radeon RX Vega M GH
1080p
low	289 FPS	295 FPS
medium	231 FPS	236 FPS
high	193 FPS	196 FPS
ultra	144 FPS	147 FPS
1440p
low	217 FPS	221 FPS
medium	173 FPS	177 FPS
high	144 FPS	147 FPS
ultra	108 FPS	110 FPS
4K
low	133 FPS	147 FPS
medium	116 FPS	118 FPS
high	82 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	54 FPS	73 FPS

Open Radeon RX 6300M Open Radeon RX Vega M GH

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Radeon RX 6300M	Radeon RX Vega M GH
1080p
low	257 FPS	148 FPS
medium	191 FPS	122 FPS
high	169 FPS	106 FPS
ultra	141 FPS	90 FPS
1440p
low	191 FPS	109 FPS
medium	138 FPS	90 FPS
high	124 FPS	78 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	65 FPS
4K
low	100 FPS	63 FPS
medium	74 FPS	50 FPS
high	64 FPS	38 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	29 FPS

Open Radeon RX 6300M Open Radeon RX Vega M GH

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6300M and Radeon RX Vega M GH

Radeon RX 6300M

The Radeon RX 6300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,421 points.

Radeon RX Vega M GH

The Radeon RX Vega M GH is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,548 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 6300M scores 6,421 and the Radeon RX Vega M GH reaches 6,548 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6300M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon RX Vega M GH uses GCN 4.0, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon RX 6300M) vs 1,536 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Raw compute: 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300M) vs 3.656 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1190 MHz.

Feature	Radeon RX 6300M	Radeon RX Vega M GH
G3D Mark Score	6,421	6,548+2%
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	6 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	768	1536+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.686 TFLOPS	3.656 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2400 MHz+102%	1190 MHz
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	48	96+100%
L1 Cache	256 KB	384 KB+50%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB
Frame Generation	FSR 3 + AFMF	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6300M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon RX Vega M GH lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

Feature	Radeon RX 6300M	Radeon RX Vega M GH
Upscaling Tech	FSR 3	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon RX 6300M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH has 0 MB. The Radeon RX 6300M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 64 GB/s (Radeon RX 6300M) vs 204.8 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — a 220% advantage for the Radeon RX Vega M GH. Bus width: 32-bit vs 1024-bit.

Feature	Radeon RX 6300M	Radeon RX Vega M GH
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR6	HBM2
Memory Bandwidth	64 GB/s	204.8 GB/s+220%
Bus Width	32-bit	1024-bit+3100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6300M) vs 12_1 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

Feature	Radeon RX 6300M	Radeon RX Vega M GH
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12_1
Max Displays	3	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: Navi 24 Media vs UVD 6.3.

Feature	Radeon RX 6300M	Radeon RX Vega M GH
Encoder	—	VCE 3.0
Decoder	Navi 24 Media	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 6300M draws 35W versus the Radeon RX Vega M GH's 100W — a 96.3% difference. The Radeon RX 6300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 6300M) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Power connectors: Mobile vs Integrated.