
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5700M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+78.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon RX 5700M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,669 vs 22,651).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Radeon RX 5700M
2020Why buy it
- ✅+78.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,669 vs 22,651).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon RX 5700M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 5700M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 40 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 456 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 285 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 342 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 143 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 239 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 116 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon RX 5700M

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX 5700M
Radeon RX 5700M
The Radeon RX 5700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,669 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon RX 5700M's 12,669 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 78.8%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 5700M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700M). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 7.926 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700M). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1720 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+79% | 12,669 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+89% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+178% | 7.926 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+47% | 1720 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 136 | 144+6% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+300% | 8 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 5700M relies on FSR Frame Generation. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5700M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 384 GB/s (Radeon RX 5700M) — a 33.3% advantage for the Radeon RX 5700M. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 8 MB (Radeon RX 5700M) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 384 GB/s+33% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+300% | 8 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5700M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700M). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon RX 5700M's 180W — a 11.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5700M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-11% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+101% | 70.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | — |
| Codename | AD106 | Navi 10 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | March 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #59 | #751 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












