
GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5700M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design
2019Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 180W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 5700M across 12 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 5700M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Radeon RX 5700M
2020Why buy it
- ✅4.1% more average FPS across 12 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌125% higher power demand at 180W vs 80W.
GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design
2019Radeon RX 5700M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 180W, a 100W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅4.1% more average FPS across 12 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 5700M across 12 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 5700M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌125% higher power demand at 180W vs 80W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5700M better than GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 45 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 40 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 195 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 42 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 456 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 285 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 431 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 345 FPS | 342 FPS |
| high | 287 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 215 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 287 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 230 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 143 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 212 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 239 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 116 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design and Radeon RX 5700M

GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design
GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design
The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1095 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,766 points.

Radeon RX 5700M
Radeon RX 5700M
The Radeon RX 5700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,669 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design scores 12,766 and the Radeon RX 5700M reaches 12,669 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 5700M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700M). Raw compute: 6.447 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 7.926 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700M). Boost clocks: 1095 MHz vs 1720 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,766 | 12,669 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2944+28% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.447 TFLOPS | 7.926 TFLOPS+23% |
| Boost Clock | 1095 MHz | 1720 MHz+57% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+28% | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 8 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5700M is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5700M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 8 MB (Radeon RX 5700M) — the Radeon RX 5700M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 384 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 8 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5700M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6 (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700M). Decoder: NVDEC 4 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design draws 80W versus the Radeon RX 5700M's 180W — a 76.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5700M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-56% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 0W-100% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 159.6+127% | 70.4 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












