
GeForce GTX TITAN X
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5700M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX TITAN X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌38.9% higher power demand at 250W vs 180W.
Radeon RX 5700M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 250W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
GeForce GTX TITAN X
2015Radeon RX 5700M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 250W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌38.9% higher power demand at 250W vs 180W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5700M better than GeForce GTX TITAN X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX TITAN X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 42 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 38 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 40 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 568 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 456 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 284 FPS | 285 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 426 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 341 FPS | 342 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 143 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 204 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 167 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 239 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 116 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX TITAN X and Radeon RX 5700M

GeForce GTX TITAN X
GeForce GTX TITAN X
The GeForce GTX TITAN X is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,621 points. Launch price was $999.

Radeon RX 5700M
Radeon RX 5700M
The Radeon RX 5700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,669 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX TITAN X scores 12,621 and the Radeon RX 5700M reaches 12,669 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN X is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 5700M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700M). Raw compute: 6.691 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 7.926 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700M). Boost clocks: 1075 MHz vs 1720 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,621 | 12,669 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+33% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.691 TFLOPS | 7.926 TFLOPS+18% |
| Boost Clock | 1075 MHz | 1720 MHz+60% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 192+33% | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 8 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5700M is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX TITAN X lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX TITAN X gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5700M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX TITAN X comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5700M has 8 GB. The GeForce GTX TITAN X offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 384 GB/s (Radeon RX 5700M) — a 14.3% advantage for the Radeon RX 5700M. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 8 MB (Radeon RX 5700M) — the Radeon RX 5700M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | 384 GB/s+14% |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 8 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5700M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_1) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd gen (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700M). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd gen vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2nd gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 2nd gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX TITAN X draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 5700M's 180W — a 32.6% difference. The Radeon RX 5700M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5700M). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 83°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 180W-28% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 83°C-2% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 50.5 | 70.4+39% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 5700M is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | — |
| Codename | GM200 | Navi 10 |
| Release | March 17 2015 | March 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #209 | #751 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













