G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅65.5% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 50.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 37.7 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Measures 240mm instead of 270mm, a 30mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon RX 5700

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 37.7 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
❌12.5% longer card at 270mm vs 240mm.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Radeon RX 5700

2019

Why buy it

✅65.5% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 50.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 37.7 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Measures 240mm instead of 270mm, a 30mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 37.7 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
❌12.5% longer card at 270mm vs 240mm.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon RX 5700?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 65.5% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data, 58.4% higher PassMark G3D performance, and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. It also comes from 2023 instead of 2019, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2019, 58.4% more raw performance headroom, better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR Frame Generation (2023), and a 5nm process instead of 7nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is about 5.3% more expensive on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $379 MSRP, and you are getting 65.5% more estimated average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data and 58.4% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 50.5%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon RX 5700 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon RX 5700 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $379 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 5700 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX 5700
1080p
low	177 FPS	149 FPS
medium	162 FPS	132 FPS
high	142 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	98 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	129 FPS
medium	118 FPS	105 FPS
high	101 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	93 FPS	76 FPS
medium	79 FPS	64 FPS
high	66 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	43 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon RX 5700

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX 5700
1080p
low	425 FPS	262 FPS
medium	359 FPS	220 FPS
high	292 FPS	154 FPS
ultra	237 FPS	112 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	159 FPS
medium	229 FPS	133 FPS
high	186 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	154 FPS	75 FPS
4K
low	117 FPS	87 FPS
medium	95 FPS	73 FPS
high	77 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	42 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon RX 5700

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX 5700
1080p
low	855 FPS	643 FPS
medium	693 FPS	515 FPS
high	609 FPS	429 FPS
ultra	510 FPS	322 FPS
1440p
low	660 FPS	482 FPS
medium	527 FPS	386 FPS
high	452 FPS	322 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	241 FPS
4K
low	447 FPS	322 FPS
medium	355 FPS	257 FPS
high	308 FPS	214 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	161 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon RX 5700

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX 5700
1080p
low	775 FPS	427 FPS
medium	639 FPS	358 FPS
high	558 FPS	298 FPS
ultra	492 FPS	255 FPS
1440p
low	613 FPS	357 FPS
medium	503 FPS	302 FPS
high	435 FPS	237 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	197 FPS
4K
low	375 FPS	193 FPS
medium	322 FPS	155 FPS
high	298 FPS	140 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	115 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon RX 5700

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon RX 5700

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX 5700

The Radeon RX 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,296 points. Launch price was $349.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon RX 5700's 14,296 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 58.4%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 7.949 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1725 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX 5700
G3D Mark Score	22,651+58%	14,296
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	5 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	4352+89%	2304
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS+178%	7.949 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2535 MHz+47%	1725 MHz
ROPs	48	64+33%
TMUs	136	144+6%
L2 Cache	32 MB+700%	4 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 5700 relies on FSR Frame Generation. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX 5700
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 448 GB/s (Radeon RX 5700) — a 55.6% advantage for the Radeon RX 5700. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 5700) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX 5700
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	288 GB/s	448 GB/s+56%
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	32 MB+700%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 5700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX 5700
DirectX	12.2+2%	12.0
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX 5700
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	VCN 2.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	VCN 2.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon RX 5700's 180W — a 11.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 600W (Radeon RX 5700). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 270mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX 5700
TDP	160W-11%	180W
Recommended PSU	550W-8%	600W
Power Connector	8-pin	6-pin + 8-pin
Length	240mm	270mm
Height	111mm	110mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-18%	85°C
Perf/Watt	141.6+78%	79.4

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 5700 launched at $379. The Radeon RX 5700 costs 5% less ($20 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 37.7 (Radeon RX 5700) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 50.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).