G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)

2020

Why buy it

✅Access to DLSS 4 Super Resolution (2025).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
✅Draws 18W instead of 180W, a 162W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 5700 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 5700 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 37.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $379 MSRP).

Radeon RX 5700

2019

Why buy it

✅11.4% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌900% higher power demand at 180W vs 18W.

Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)

2020

Radeon RX 5700

2019

Why buy it

✅Access to DLSS 4 Super Resolution (2025).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
✅Draws 18W instead of 180W, a 162W reduction.

Why buy it

✅11.4% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 5700 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 5700 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 37.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $379 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌900% higher power demand at 180W vs 18W.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) better than Radeon RX 5700?

Yes. Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 3.7% higher PassMark G3D performance, DLSS 4 + Multi Frame Gen, and 16 GB vs 8 GB of VRAM. It also comes from 2020 instead of 2019, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 5700 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of DLSS 4 Super Resolution (2025) and a 7nm process instead of 12nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $379 MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data and 3.7% higher G3D Mark. Radeon RX 5700 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, Radeon RX 5700 still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

When does Radeon RX 5700 make more sense than Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)?

Yes. Radeon RX 5700 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is future-proofing and staying closer to $379 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile). The trade-off is that Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) currently gives you 3.7% higher G3D Mark and lower estimated average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data. Radeon RX 5700 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 5700 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)	Radeon RX 5700
1080p
low	180 FPS	149 FPS
medium	164 FPS	132 FPS
high	139 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	125 FPS	98 FPS
1440p
low	166 FPS	129 FPS
medium	140 FPS	105 FPS
high	111 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	98 FPS	76 FPS
medium	86 FPS	64 FPS
high	59 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	54 FPS	43 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)Open Radeon RX 5700

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)	Radeon RX 5700
1080p
low	183 FPS	262 FPS
medium	159 FPS	220 FPS
high	126 FPS	154 FPS
ultra	96 FPS	112 FPS
1440p
low	128 FPS	159 FPS
medium	107 FPS	133 FPS
high	85 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	67 FPS	75 FPS
4K
low	78 FPS	87 FPS
medium	66 FPS	73 FPS
high	52 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	42 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)Open Radeon RX 5700

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)	Radeon RX 5700
1080p
low	472 FPS	643 FPS
medium	395 FPS	515 FPS
high	302 FPS	429 FPS
ultra	267 FPS	322 FPS
1440p
low	330 FPS	482 FPS
medium	281 FPS	386 FPS
high	214 FPS	322 FPS
ultra	176 FPS	241 FPS
4K
low	208 FPS	322 FPS
medium	182 FPS	257 FPS
high	125 FPS	214 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	161 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)Open Radeon RX 5700

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)	Radeon RX 5700
1080p
low	389 FPS	427 FPS
medium	323 FPS	358 FPS
high	261 FPS	298 FPS
ultra	223 FPS	255 FPS
1440p
low	312 FPS	357 FPS
medium	253 FPS	302 FPS
high	188 FPS	237 FPS
ultra	152 FPS	197 FPS
4K
low	151 FPS	193 FPS
medium	114 FPS	155 FPS
high	99 FPS	140 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	115 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)Open Radeon RX 5700

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) and Radeon RX 5700

Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)

The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 18W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,832 points.

Radeon RX 5700

The Radeon RX 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,296 points. Launch price was $349.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) scores 14,832 and the Radeon RX 5700 reaches 14,296 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 896 (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700). Raw compute: 3.037 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)) vs 7.949 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700). Boost clocks: 1695 MHz vs 1725 MHz.

Feature	Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)	Radeon RX 5700
G3D Mark Score	14,832+4%	14,296
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	12 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	896	2304+157%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.037 TFLOPS	7.949 TFLOPS+162%
Boost Clock	1695 MHz	1725 MHz+2%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	56	144+157%
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) uses DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 5700 relies on FSR Frame Generation. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)	Radeon RX 5700
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 4 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation	FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 4)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5700 has 8 GB. The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 5700) — the Radeon RX 5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)	Radeon RX 5700
VRAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 5700). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)	Radeon RX 5700
DirectX	12.2+2%	12.0
Vulkan	1.2+9%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700).

Feature	Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)	Radeon RX 5700
Encoder	7th Gen NVENC	VCN 2.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	VCN 2.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) draws 18W versus the Radeon RX 5700's 180W — a 163.6% difference. The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)) vs 600W (Radeon RX 5700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 270mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

Feature	Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)	Radeon RX 5700
TDP	18W-90%	180W
Recommended PSU	500W-17%	600W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	6-pin + 8-pin
Length	0mm	270mm
Height	0mm	110mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C-6%	85°C
Perf/Watt	824.0+938%	79.4