G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

2023

Why buy it

✅9.3% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $79 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
✅Delivers 26.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 37.7 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon RX 5700

2019

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
26.3% HIGHER MSRP
$379 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 37.7 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

2023

Radeon RX 5700

2019

Why buy it

✅9.3% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $79 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
✅Delivers 26.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 37.7 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
26.3% HIGHER MSRP
$379 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 37.7 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile better than Radeon RX 5700?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile averages 9.3% more FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 14,332 vs 14,296 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, plus much lower power draw (50W vs 180W).

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2019, better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR Frame Generation (2023), and a 5nm process instead of 7nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is about $79 cheaper on MSRP at $300 MSRP versus $379 MSRP, and you are getting 9.3% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and 0.3% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 26.7%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon RX 5700 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon RX 5700 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $379 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 5700 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile	Radeon RX 5700
1080p
low	136 FPS	149 FPS
medium	120 FPS	132 FPS
high	105 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	98 FPS
1440p
low	120 FPS	129 FPS
medium	99 FPS	105 FPS
high	84 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	72 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	67 FPS	76 FPS
medium	59 FPS	64 FPS
high	42 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	43 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile Open Radeon RX 5700

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile	Radeon RX 5700
1080p
low	296 FPS	262 FPS
medium	245 FPS	220 FPS
high	188 FPS	154 FPS
ultra	145 FPS	112 FPS
1440p
low	198 FPS	159 FPS
medium	166 FPS	133 FPS
high	137 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	109 FPS	75 FPS
4K
low	105 FPS	87 FPS
medium	87 FPS	73 FPS
high	75 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	42 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile Open Radeon RX 5700

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile	Radeon RX 5700
1080p
low	645 FPS	643 FPS
medium	516 FPS	515 FPS
high	430 FPS	429 FPS
ultra	322 FPS	322 FPS
1440p
low	442 FPS	482 FPS
medium	373 FPS	386 FPS
high	316 FPS	322 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	241 FPS
4K
low	321 FPS	322 FPS
medium	258 FPS	257 FPS
high	200 FPS	214 FPS
ultra	153 FPS	161 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile Open Radeon RX 5700

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile	Radeon RX 5700
1080p
low	484 FPS	427 FPS
medium	424 FPS	358 FPS
high	360 FPS	298 FPS
ultra	322 FPS	255 FPS
1440p
low	402 FPS	357 FPS
medium	351 FPS	302 FPS
high	285 FPS	237 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	197 FPS
4K
low	240 FPS	193 FPS
medium	203 FPS	155 FPS
high	185 FPS	140 FPS
ultra	159 FPS	115 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile Open Radeon RX 5700

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile and Radeon RX 5700

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1455 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,332 points.

Radeon RX 5700

The Radeon RX 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,296 points. Launch price was $349.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile scores 14,332 and the Radeon RX 5700 reaches 14,296 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 7.949 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1725 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile	Radeon RX 5700
G3D Mark Score	14,332	14,296
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	5 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	2560+11%	2304
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.986 TFLOPS+13%	7.949 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1755 MHz+2%	1725 MHz
ROPs	48	64+33%
TMUs	80	144+80%
L2 Cache	12 MB+200%	4 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 5700 relies on FSR Frame Generation. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile	Radeon RX 5700
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 448 GB/s (Radeon RX 5700) — a 133.3% advantage for the Radeon RX 5700. Bus width: 96-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 12 MB (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 5700) — the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile	Radeon RX 5700
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	192 GB/s	448 GB/s+133%
Bus Width	96-bit	256-bit+167%
L2 Cache	12 MB+200%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 5700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile	Radeon RX 5700
DirectX	12.2+2%	12.0
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile	Radeon RX 5700
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	VCN 2.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	VCN 2.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile draws 50W versus the Radeon RX 5700's 180W — a 113% difference. The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 600W (Radeon RX 5700). Power connectors: Mobile vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 270mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile	Radeon RX 5700
TDP	50W-72%	180W
Recommended PSU	500W-17%	600W
Power Connector	Mobile	6-pin + 8-pin
Length	0mm	270mm
Height	0mm	110mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C-6%	85°C
Perf/Watt	286.6+261%	79.4

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile launched at $300 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 5700 launched at $379. The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile costs 20.8% less ($79 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 37.7 (Radeon RX 5700) — the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile offers 26.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).