
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5600 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
2021Why buy it
- ✅73.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌1154.1% HIGHER MSRP$3,499 MSRPvs$279 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 48.2 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 400W vs 150W.
Radeon RX 5600 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,220 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1179.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 48.2 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 400W, a 250W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
2021Radeon RX 5600 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅73.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,220 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1179.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 48.2 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 400W, a 250W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌1154.1% HIGHER MSRP$3,499 MSRPvs$279 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 48.2 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 400W vs 150W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5600 XT better than Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot make more sense than Radeon RX 5600 XT?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 32 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 579 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 194 FPS |
| high | 390 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 397 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 263 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 593 FPS | 605 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 395 FPS | 404 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 303 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 445 FPS | 454 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 363 FPS |
| high | 297 FPS | 303 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 227 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 303 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 151 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 593 FPS | 247 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 395 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 445 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 297 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 56 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot and Radeon RX 5600 XT

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 1967 MHz. It has 3840 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 400W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 ×2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,182 points. Launch price was $4,999.

Radeon RX 5600 XT
Radeon RX 5600 XT
The Radeon RX 5600 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,453 points. Launch price was $279.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot scores 13,182 and the Radeon RX 5600 XT reaches 13,453 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon RX 5600 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5600 XT). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 7.188 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5600 XT). Boost clocks: 1967 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,182 | 13,453+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840 ×2+67% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS ×2+110% | 7.188 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1967 MHz+26% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 ×2+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 240 ×2+67% | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5600 XT is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5600 XT has 6 GB. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 336 GB/s (Radeon RX 5600 XT) — a 157.1% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot. Bus width: 384-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 5600 XT) — the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 864 GB/s+157% | 336 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 12 (Radeon RX 5600 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (2x) (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5600 XT). Decoder: VCN 4.0 (2x) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5600 XT).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 (2x) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 (2x) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot draws 400W versus the Radeon RX 5600 XT's 150W — a 90.9% difference. The Radeon RX 5600 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 450W (Radeon RX 5600 XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 280mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 400W | 150W-63% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 280mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 33.0 | 89.7+172% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot launched at $3499 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 5600 XT launched at $279. The Radeon RX 5600 XT costs 92% less ($3220 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.8 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) vs 48.2 (Radeon RX 5600 XT) — the Radeon RX 5600 XT offers 1168.4% better value. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3499 | $279-92% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.8 | 48.2+1168% |
| Codename | Navi 21 | Navi 10 |
| Release | August 3 2021 | January 21 2020 |
| Ranking | #157 | #187 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













