
GeForce GTX 1660
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1660
2019Why buy it
- ✅12.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($219 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 150W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 241mm, a 12mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Radeon RX 5600
2020Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1660 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌4.6% HIGHER MSRP$229 MSRPvs$219 MSRP
- ❌25% higher power demand at 150W vs 120W.
GeForce GTX 1660
2019Radeon RX 5600
2020Why buy it
- ✅12.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($219 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 150W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 241mm, a 12mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1660 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌4.6% HIGHER MSRP$229 MSRPvs$219 MSRP
- ❌25% higher power demand at 150W vs 120W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5600 better than GeForce GTX 1660?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1660 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 101 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 36 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 524 FPS | 529 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 423 FPS |
| high | 346 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 264 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 264 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 132 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 364 FPS | 247 FPS |
| medium | 301 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 251 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 216 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 296 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 243 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 56 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 and Radeon RX 5600

GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660
The GeForce GTX 1660 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 14 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,639 points. Launch price was $219.

Radeon RX 5600
Radeon RX 5600
The Radeon RX 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1265 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,753 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1660 scores 11,639 and the Radeon RX 5600 reaches 11,753 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 5600 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5600). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 5.829 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5600). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1265 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,639 | 11,753 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 2304+64% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.027 TFLOPS | 5.829 TFLOPS+16% |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz+41% | 1265 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 88 | 144+64% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 3 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5600 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1660 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 1660 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5600 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 6 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 5600) — a 50% advantage for the Radeon RX 5600. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 5600) — the Radeon RX 5600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 288 GB/s+50% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 3 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5600). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1660) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5600). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5600).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1660 draws 120W versus the Radeon RX 5600's 150W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5600). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W-20% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 97.0+24% | 78.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1660 launched at $219 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 5600 launched at $229. The GeForce GTX 1660 costs 4.4% less ($10 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 53.1 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 51.3 (Radeon RX 5600) — the GeForce GTX 1660 offers 3.5% better value. The Radeon RX 5600 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $219-4% | $229 |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.1+4% | 51.3 |
| Codename | TU116 | Navi 10 |
| Release | March 14 2019 | July 7 2020 |
| Ranking | #231 | #295 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













