
Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5600 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 300W vs 150W.
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
Radeon RX 5600 OEM
2020Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 300W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
2018Radeon RX 5600 OEM
2020Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 300W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 300W vs 150W.
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5600 OEM better than Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 101 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 84 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 45 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 209 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 552 FPS | 555 FPS |
| medium | 441 FPS | 444 FPS |
| high | 368 FPS | 370 FPS |
| ultra | 276 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 414 FPS | 416 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 333 FPS |
| high | 276 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 207 FPS | 208 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 222 FPS |
| high | 184 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 139 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 321 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 217 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 237 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 212 FPS | 172 FPS |
| high | 185 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 56 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU and Radeon RX 5600 OEM

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
The Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,258 points.

Radeon RX 5600 OEM
Radeon RX 5600 OEM
The Radeon RX 5600 OEM is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,333 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU scores 12,258 and the Radeon RX 5600 OEM reaches 12,333 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon RX 5600 OEM uses RDNA 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Raw compute: 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) vs 6.39 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,258 | 12,333 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 ×2+75% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.75 TFLOPS ×2+68% | 6.39 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | 1560 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 64 ×2 | 64 |
| TMUs | 224 ×2+75% | 128 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5600 OEM is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 5600 OEM) — the Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.1 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Decoder: UVD 7.2 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5600 OEM).
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.1 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 7.2 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU draws 300W versus the Radeon RX 5600 OEM's 150W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon RX 5600 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 150W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 40.9 | 82.2+101% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













