
Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
Popular choices:

Tesla T10
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ❌15.4% higher power demand at 300W vs 260W.
Tesla T10
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 260W instead of 300W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
2018Tesla T10
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 260W instead of 300W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ❌15.4% higher power demand at 300W vs 260W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quick Answers
So, is Tesla T10 better than Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU make more sense than Tesla T10?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 101 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 84 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 45 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 25 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 295 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 169 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 36 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 552 FPS | 565 FPS |
| medium | 441 FPS | 452 FPS |
| high | 368 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 276 FPS | 283 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 414 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 276 FPS | 283 FPS |
| ultra | 207 FPS | 212 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 184 FPS | 188 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 141 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 334 FPS |
| medium | 224 FPS | 293 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 250 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 149 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 121 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 84 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU and Tesla T10

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
The Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,258 points.

Tesla T10
Tesla T10
The Tesla T10 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in sem dados. It features the Turing architecture. The boost clock speed is 1560 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,558 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU scores 12,258 and the Tesla T10 reaches 12,558 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU is built on GCN 5.0 while the Tesla T10 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) vs 4,608 (Tesla T10). Raw compute: 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) vs 14.38 TFLOPS (Tesla T10). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,258 | 12,558+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 ×2 | 4608+29% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 | 14.38 TFLOPS+34% |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | 1560 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 64 ×2 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 224 ×2 | 288+29% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) vs 12.2 (Tesla T10). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.1 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Tesla T10). Decoder: UVD 7.2 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Tesla T10).
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.1 | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | UVD 7.2 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU draws 300W versus the Tesla T10's 260W — a 14.3% difference. The Tesla T10 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) vs 500W (Tesla T10). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 260W-13% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 40.9 | 48.3+18% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













