Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU vs Tesla T10

AMD

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU

2018Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1500 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

Tesla T10

Boost: 1560 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU

2018

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
  • 15.4% higher power demand at 300W vs 260W.

Tesla T10

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 260W instead of 300W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Quick Answers

So, is Tesla T10 better than Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 12,258 vs 12,558 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Tesla T10 is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2018 generation instead of 0 and better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Tesla T10 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $2,000 MSRP. Tesla T10 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Tesla T10 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $2,000 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 2.4% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU is the newer 2018 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU make more sense than Tesla T10?
Yes. Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Tesla T10. The trade-off is that Tesla T10 currently gives you 2.4% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon Pro V520 MxGPUTesla T10
1080p
low125 FPS155 FPS
medium107 FPS137 FPS
high89 FPS111 FPS
ultra62 FPS70 FPS
1440p
low101 FPS127 FPS
medium84 FPS106 FPS
high65 FPS80 FPS
ultra45 FPS51 FPS
4K
low45 FPS49 FPS
medium39 FPS43 FPS
high28 FPS30 FPS
ultra24 FPS25 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon Pro V520 MxGPUTesla T10
1080p
low295 FPS294 FPS
medium251 FPS247 FPS
high198 FPS171 FPS
ultra156 FPS125 FPS
1440p
low199 FPS176 FPS
medium169 FPS136 FPS
high144 FPS103 FPS
ultra111 FPS76 FPS
4K
low96 FPS77 FPS
medium80 FPS61 FPS
high67 FPS49 FPS
ultra51 FPS36 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon Pro V520 MxGPUTesla T10
1080p
low552 FPS565 FPS
medium441 FPS452 FPS
high368 FPS377 FPS
ultra276 FPS283 FPS
1440p
low414 FPS424 FPS
medium331 FPS339 FPS
high276 FPS283 FPS
ultra207 FPS212 FPS
4K
low276 FPS283 FPS
medium221 FPS226 FPS
high184 FPS188 FPS
ultra138 FPS141 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon Pro V520 MxGPUTesla T10
1080p
low259 FPS334 FPS
medium224 FPS293 FPS
high190 FPS250 FPS
ultra153 FPS200 FPS
1440p
low197 FPS254 FPS
medium175 FPS228 FPS
high149 FPS196 FPS
ultra118 FPS154 FPS
4K
low121 FPS150 FPS
medium105 FPS129 FPS
high83 FPS108 FPS
ultra67 FPS84 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU and Tesla T10

AMD

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU

The Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,258 points.

NVIDIA

Tesla T10

The Tesla T10 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in sem dados. It features the Turing architecture. The boost clock speed is 1560 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,558 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU scores 12,258 and the Tesla T10 reaches 12,558 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU is built on GCN 5.0 while the Tesla T10 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) vs 4,608 (Tesla T10). Raw compute: 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) vs 14.38 TFLOPS (Tesla T10). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 1560 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Pro V520 MxGPUTesla T10
G3D Mark Score
12,258
12,558+2%
Architecture
GCN 5.0
Turing
Process Node
14 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
3584 ×2
4608+29%
Compute (TFLOPS)
10.75 TFLOPS ×2
14.38 TFLOPS+34%
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
1560 MHz+4%
ROPs
64 ×2
96+50%
TMUs
224 ×2
288+29%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro V520 MxGPUTesla T10
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.

FeatureRadeon Pro V520 MxGPUTesla T10
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) vs 12.2 (Tesla T10). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.

FeatureRadeon Pro V520 MxGPUTesla T10
DirectX
12.1
12.2
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
0
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 4.1 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Tesla T10). Decoder: UVD 7.2 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Tesla T10).

FeatureRadeon Pro V520 MxGPUTesla T10
Encoder
VCE 4.1
7th Gen NVENC
Decoder
UVD 7.2
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU draws 300W versus the Tesla T10's 260W — a 14.3% difference. The Tesla T10 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) vs 500W (Tesla T10). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

FeatureRadeon Pro V520 MxGPUTesla T10
TDP
300W
260W-13%
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
267mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
80°C-6%
85°C
Perf/Watt
40.9
48.3+18%