
Radeon Pro 560X
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 560
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro 560X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon RX 560: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon RX 560 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 37.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
Radeon RX 560
2017Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon Pro 560X
2018Radeon RX 560
2017Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon RX 560: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon RX 560 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 37.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 560 better than Radeon Pro 560X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro 560X make more sense than Radeon RX 560?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 560X | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 48 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 32 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 10 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 560X | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 5 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro 560X | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 41 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro 560X | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 27 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 560X and Radeon RX 560

Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560X
The Radeon Pro 560X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 16 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1004 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,678 points.

Radeon RX 560
Radeon RX 560
The Radeon RX 560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $99.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 560X scores 3,678 and the Radeon RX 560 reaches 3,682 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 560X is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon RX 560 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro 560X) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560). Raw compute: 2.056 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 560X) vs 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560X | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,678 | 3,682 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.056 TFLOPS | 2.611 TFLOPS+27% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 64 | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 560 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro 560X lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560X | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 560X comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 560 has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 560 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560X | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro 560X) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon RX 560). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560X | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon Pro 560X) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 560). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro 560X) vs HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4 (Radeon RX 560).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560X | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 560X draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 560's 75W — a 0% difference. The Radeon RX 560 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 560X) vs 450W (Radeon RX 560). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 170mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 70 C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560X | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 0mm | 170mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 70 C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 49.0 | 49.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 560X launched at $0 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 560 launched at $99. The Radeon Pro 560X costs 100+% less ($99 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Radeon Pro 560X) vs 37.2 (Radeon RX 560) — the Radeon Pro 560X offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Pro 560X is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560X | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $99 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 37.2 |
| Codename | Polaris 21 | Polaris 21 |
| Release | July 16 2018 | April 18 2017 |
| Ranking | #528 | #527 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












