
Radeon 840M
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 560
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon 840M
2024Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3+ (2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3+ (2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 37.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
Radeon RX 560
2017Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.
Radeon 840M
2024Radeon RX 560
2017Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3+ (2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3+ (2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 37.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon 840M better than Radeon RX 560?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 560 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon 840M | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 29 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 22 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon 840M | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 5 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon 840M | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 41 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon 840M | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 27 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 840M and Radeon RX 560

Radeon 840M
Radeon 840M
The Radeon 840M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 2 2024. It features the RDNA 3+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2900 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.

Radeon RX 560
Radeon RX 560
The Radeon RX 560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $99.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 840M scores 3,803 and the Radeon RX 560 reaches 3,682 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 840M is built on RDNA 3+ while the Radeon RX 560 uses GCN 4.0, both on 4 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 256 (Radeon 840M) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 1275 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 840M | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,803+3% | 3,682 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3+ | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 1024+300% |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+127% | 1275 MHz |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 560 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon 840M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon 840M | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 840M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 560 has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 560 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon 840M | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 256-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (Radeon 840M) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon RX 560). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon 840M | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon 840M) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 560). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 840M) vs HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4 (Radeon RX 560).
| Feature | Radeon 840M | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 840M draws 30W versus the Radeon RX 560's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon 840M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 840M) vs 450W (Radeon RX 560). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Typical load temperature: 90 vs 70 C.
| Feature | Radeon 840M | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-60% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | — | 170mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 90 | 70 C-22% |
| Perf/Watt | 126.8+158% | 49.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 840M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon 840M | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $99 |
| Codename | Krackan Point | Polaris 21 |
| Release | June 2 2024 | April 18 2017 |
| Ranking | #516 | #527 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












