G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅478.6% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 20.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 37.2 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.
❌78.8% longer card at 304mm vs 170mm.

Radeon RX 560

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $500 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.
✅Measures 170mm instead of 304mm, a 134mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 37.2 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Radeon RX 560

2017

Why buy it

✅478.6% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 20.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 37.2 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $500 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.
✅Measures 170mm instead of 304mm, a 134mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.
❌78.8% longer card at 304mm vs 170mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 37.2 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than Radeon RX 560?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 4070 averages 478.6% more FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 26,919 vs 3,682 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon RX 560 is a 2017 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2017, 631.1% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 4 GB, and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR Frame Generation (2023). That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 4070 is about 505.1% more expensive on MSRP at $599 MSRP versus $99 MSRP, and you are getting 478.6% more estimated average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data and 631.1% higher G3D Mark. Radeon RX 560 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Radeon RX 560 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon RX 560 is 2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM, 3,682 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 560 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon RX 560
1080p
low	183 FPS	41 FPS
medium	167 FPS	26 FPS
high	151 FPS	20 FPS
ultra	131 FPS	11 FPS
1440p
low	150 FPS	28 FPS
medium	124 FPS	17 FPS
high	110 FPS	10 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	5 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	10 FPS
medium	78 FPS	7 FPS
high	65 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Radeon RX 560

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon RX 560
1080p
low	544 FPS	88 FPS
medium	454 FPS	58 FPS
high	353 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	299 FPS	25 FPS
1440p
low	351 FPS	42 FPS
medium	288 FPS	31 FPS
high	235 FPS	22 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	15 FPS
4K
low	172 FPS	11 FPS
medium	144 FPS	9 FPS
high	125 FPS	8 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	5 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Radeon RX 560

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon RX 560
1080p
low	884 FPS	166 FPS
medium	713 FPS	133 FPS
high	643 FPS	110 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	83 FPS
1440p
low	684 FPS	124 FPS
medium	549 FPS	99 FPS
high	483 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	424 FPS	62 FPS
4K
low	467 FPS	83 FPS
medium	373 FPS	66 FPS
high	326 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	277 FPS	41 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Radeon RX 560

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon RX 560
1080p
low	751 FPS	154 FPS
medium	612 FPS	119 FPS
high	536 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	497 FPS	81 FPS
1440p
low	615 FPS	110 FPS
medium	500 FPS	87 FPS
high	433 FPS	72 FPS
ultra	395 FPS	58 FPS
4K
low	384 FPS	62 FPS
medium	324 FPS	47 FPS
high	301 FPS	36 FPS
ultra	272 FPS	27 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Radeon RX 560

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Radeon RX 560

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon RX 560

The Radeon RX 560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Radeon RX 560's 3,682 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 631.1%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 560 uses GCN 4.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1275 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon RX 560
G3D Mark Score	26,919+631%	3,682
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	GCN 4.0
Process Node	5 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	5888+475%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	29.15 TFLOPS+1016%	2.611 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2475 MHz+94%	1275 MHz
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	184+188%	64
L1 Cache	5.8 MB+2220%	0.25 MB
L2 Cache	36 MB+3500%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4070 uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 560 relies on FSR Frame Generation. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 560 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon RX 560
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 560 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 560) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon RX 560
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+200%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	504 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	192-bit	256-bit+33%
L2 Cache	36 MB+3500%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon RX 560). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon RX 560
DirectX	12.2+2%	12 (12_0)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 560). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4 (Radeon RX 560).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon RX 560
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC (2x)	VCE 3.4
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	UVD 6.3
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Radeon RX 560's 75W — a 90.9% difference. The Radeon RX 560 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 450W (Radeon RX 560). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None. Card length: 304mm vs 170mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70 C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon RX 560
TDP	200W	75W-63%
Recommended PSU	650W	450W-31%
Power Connector	8-pin	None
Length	304mm	170mm
Height	137mm	112mm
Slots	3	2-33%
Temp (Load)	80°C	70 C-13%
Perf/Watt	134.6+174%	49.1

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 560 launched at $99. The Radeon RX 560 costs 83.5% less ($500 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 37.2 (Radeon RX 560) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 20.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).