
Radeon R9 Fury X
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5500 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon R9 Fury X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌226.1% HIGHER MSRP$649 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.5 vs 45.6 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Radeon RX 5500 XT
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $450 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 215.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.6 vs 14.5 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon R9 Fury X
2015Radeon RX 5500 XT
2019Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $450 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 215.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.6 vs 14.5 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌226.1% HIGHER MSRP$649 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.5 vs 45.6 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon R9 Fury X better than Radeon RX 5500 XT?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 5500 XT make more sense than Radeon R9 Fury X?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 Fury X | Radeon RX 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 34 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 31 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 23 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 Fury X | Radeon RX 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 219 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 101 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 20 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon R9 Fury X | Radeon RX 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 422 FPS | 409 FPS |
| medium | 338 FPS | 327 FPS |
| high | 281 FPS | 272 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 317 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 253 FPS | 245 FPS |
| high | 211 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 211 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 169 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 102 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon R9 Fury X | Radeon RX 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 245 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 88 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 Fury X and Radeon RX 5500 XT

Radeon R9 Fury X
Radeon R9 Fury X
The Radeon R9 Fury X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 24 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,382 points. Launch price was $649.

Radeon RX 5500 XT
Radeon RX 5500 XT
The Radeon RX 5500 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 12 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1845 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,080 points. Launch price was $169.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 Fury X scores 9,382 and the Radeon RX 5500 XT reaches 9,080 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 Fury X is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon RX 5500 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon R9 Fury X) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5500 XT). Raw compute: 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury X) vs 5.196 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5500 XT). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 1845 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury X | Radeon RX 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,382+3% | 9,080 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+191% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.602 TFLOPS+66% | 5.196 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | 1845 MHz+76% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 256+191% | 88 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5500 XT is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon R9 Fury X lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury X | Radeon RX 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 Fury X comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5500 XT has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 5500 XT offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Fury X) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 5500 XT) — a 128.6% advantage for the Radeon R9 Fury X. Bus width: 4096-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury X | Radeon RX 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | HBM | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+129% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 4096-bit+3100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury X) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5500 XT). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury X | Radeon RX 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury X) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5500 XT). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5500 XT).
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury X | Radeon RX 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 Fury X draws 275W versus the Radeon RX 5500 XT's 130W — a 71.6% difference. The Radeon RX 5500 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Radeon R9 Fury X) vs 450W (Radeon RX 5500 XT). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 195mm vs 180mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury X | Radeon RX 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 275W | 130W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 450W-25% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 195mm | 180mm |
| Height | 115mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C-20% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 34.1 | 69.8+105% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 Fury X launched at $649 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 5500 XT launched at $199. The Radeon RX 5500 XT costs 69.3% less ($450 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.5 (Radeon R9 Fury X) vs 45.6 (Radeon RX 5500 XT) — the Radeon RX 5500 XT offers 214.5% better value. The Radeon RX 5500 XT is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury X | Radeon RX 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $649 | $199-69% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.5 | 45.6+214% |
| Codename | Fiji | Navi 14 |
| Release | June 24 2015 | December 12 2019 |
| Ranking | #282 | #291 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













