
Quadro P4000 (móvel)
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro P4000 (móvel)
2017Why buy it
- ✅29.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌534.9% HIGHER MSRP$819 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 59.0 G3D/$ ($819 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
Radeon RX 5300
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $690 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $819 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 543.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 59.0 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $819 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P4000 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quadro P4000 (móvel)
2017Radeon RX 5300
2020Why buy it
- ✅29.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $690 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $819 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 543.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 59.0 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $819 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌534.9% HIGHER MSRP$819 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 59.0 G3D/$ ($819 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P4000 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5300 better than Quadro P4000 (móvel)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P4000 (móvel) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 21 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 15 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 338 FPS | 342 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 253 FPS | 257 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 127 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 74 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 247 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 48 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P4000 (móvel) and Radeon RX 5300

Quadro P4000 (móvel)
Quadro P4000 (móvel)
The Quadro P4000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1227 MHz to 1228 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,500 points. Launch price was $819.61.

Radeon RX 5300
Radeon RX 5300
The Radeon RX 5300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,606 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P4000 (móvel) scores 7,500 and the Radeon RX 5300 reaches 7,606 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P4000 (móvel) is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 5300 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5300). Raw compute: 4.398 TFLOPS (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5300). Boost clocks: 1228 MHz vs 1645 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,500 | 7,606+1% |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+27% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.398 TFLOPS | 4.632 TFLOPS+5% |
| Boost Clock | 1228 MHz | 1645 MHz+34% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 112+27% | 88 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5300 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P4000 (móvel) lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P4000 (móvel) comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5300 has 3 GB. The Quadro P4000 (móvel) offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 96-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 1.5 MB (Radeon RX 5300) — the Quadro P4000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+167% | 96-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5300). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5300). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 5300).
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (6th Gen) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (3rd Gen) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P4000 (móvel) draws 100W versus the Radeon RX 5300's 100W — a 0% difference. The Radeon RX 5300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 350W (Radeon RX 5300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 180mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 180mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 75.0 | 76.1+1% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P4000 (móvel) launched at $819 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 5300 launched at $129. The Radeon RX 5300 costs 84.2% less ($690 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.2 (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 59.0 (Radeon RX 5300) — the Radeon RX 5300 offers 541.3% better value. The Radeon RX 5300 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $819 | $129-84% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.2 | 59.0+541% |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 14 |
| Release | January 11 2017 | May 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #326 | #336 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












