
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 480
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+165% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 52.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 37.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon RX 480
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,546 vs 22,651).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 37.3 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Radeon RX 480
2016Why buy it
- ✅+165% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 52.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 37.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,546 vs 22,651).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 37.3 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon RX 480?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 480 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 18 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 385 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 256 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 288 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 96 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 290 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 62 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon RX 480

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX 480
Radeon RX 480
The Radeon RX 480 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 29 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1120 MHz to 1266 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,546 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon RX 480's 8,546 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 165%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 480 uses GCN 4.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 480). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 5.834 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 480). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1266 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+165% | 8,546 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+89% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+278% | 5.834 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+100% | 1266 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 136 | 144+6% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+668% | 0.56 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon RX 480 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 480 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 256 GB/s (Radeon RX 480) — a 12.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 480) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+13% | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 480). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 480). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 480).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon RX 480's 150W — a 6.5% difference. The Radeon RX 480 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon RX 480). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 150W-6% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 95mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+148% | 57.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 480 launched at $229. The Radeon RX 480 costs 42.6% less ($170 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 37.3 (Radeon RX 480) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 52.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $229-43% |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+52% | 37.3 |
| Codename | AD106 | Ellesmere |
| Release | May 18 2023 | June 29 2016 |
| Ranking | #59 | #305 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












