
Radeon R9 M290X
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M470X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon R9 M290X
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌14.3% HIGHER MSRP$400 MSRPvs$350 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.0 vs 9.3 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.
Radeon R9 M470X
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 15.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.3 vs 8.0 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon R9 M290X
2014Radeon R9 M470X
2016Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 15.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.3 vs 8.0 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌14.3% HIGHER MSRP$400 MSRPvs$350 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.0 vs 9.3 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon R9 M470X better than Radeon R9 M290X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon R9 M290X make more sense than Radeon R9 M470X?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 M290X | Radeon R9 M470X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 M290X | Radeon R9 M470X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 84 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 30 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 8 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 8 FPS |
| medium | 16 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 3 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon R9 M290X | Radeon R9 M470X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon R9 M290X | Radeon R9 M470X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 84 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 18 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M290X and Radeon R9 M470X

Radeon R9 M290X
Radeon R9 M290X
The Radeon R9 M290X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,218 points.

Radeon R9 M470X
Radeon R9 M470X
The Radeon R9 M470X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,244 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M290X scores 3,218 and the Radeon R9 M470X reaches 3,244 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M290X is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M470X uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon R9 M290X) vs 896 (Radeon R9 M470X). Raw compute: 2.304 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M290X) vs 1.971 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M470X). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1100 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M290X | Radeon R9 M470X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,218 | 3,244 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+43% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.304 TFLOPS+17% | 1.971 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1100 MHz+22% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+43% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+43% | 224 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M290X | Radeon R9 M470X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon R9 M290X) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 M470X) — the Radeon R9 M290X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M290X | Radeon R9 M470X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M290X draws 100W versus the Radeon R9 M470X's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon R9 M470X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M290X) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M470X). Power connectors: Mobile vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M290X | Radeon R9 M470X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 75W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Mobile |
| Perf/Watt | 32.2 | 43.3+34% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M290X launched at $400 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M470X launched at $350. The Radeon R9 M470X costs 12.5% less ($50 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.0 (Radeon R9 M290X) vs 9.3 (Radeon R9 M470X) — the Radeon R9 M470X offers 16.3% better value. The Radeon R9 M470X is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M290X | Radeon R9 M470X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $400 | $350-13% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.0 | 9.3+16% |
| Codename | Neptune | Emerald |
| Release | January 9 2014 | May 15 2016 |
| Ranking | #566 | #563 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












